Improving Male Attendance in Antenatal Clinics through Reduction in Delivery Fees as Incentives for their Pregnant Spouses: a Case Study in Rivers State, Nigeria

Download Article

DOI: 10.21522/TIJMG.2015.03.02.Art020

Authors : Kenny C. Ewulum

Abstract:

Background: Despite increases in reproductive health interventions that target male involvement in maternal health, there are still evidences to show that male spouses for some reasons do not support their spouses during antenatal care sessions. This would otherwise serve as an avenue for health education and ensure males can support their spouses through the antennal period and in child birth. The Objective: The purpose of the study was to ascertain levels of participation of male spouses in antenatal clinics and the effect of reducing cost of delivery to improving male antenatal attendance. Materials and Methods:  This descriptive cross-sectional study was undertaken in Port Harcourt and Obio-akpor Local Government Areas in Rivers State, Nigeria. Semi-structured questionnaires were used to collect information from pregnant women, male spouses, healthcare workers and Medical directors. Results: Notably following interviews was that both male and pregnant women alike were aligned to the thinking that women were generally more likely to be concerned about antenatal care than men. Secondly reducing the amount for delivery during child birth by health care providers drastically increased the number of men attending antenatal clinics with their spouses. Conclusion: The study has shown that incentives for men during antenatal care can serve as a strategy for improving maternal outcomes during child birth. Notably is that there is need for continued strategies to ensure male involvement in antenatal care to improve health education especially in low resource settings.

Keywords: Improving male attendance in antenatal clinics

References:

[1]. Carter M. Husbands and maternal health matters in rural Guatemala: wives' reports on their spouses' involvement in pregnancy and birth. Soc Sci Med. 2002; 55(3):437–50. PMID: 12144151

[2]. Dudgeon MR, Inhorn MC. Men's influences on women's reproductive health: medical anthropological perspectives. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 59(7):1379–95. PMID 51246168

[3]. JHPIEGO. Maternal and Neonatal health (MNH) program, birth preparedness and complication readiness: A matrix of shared responsibilities. Maternal and Neonatal Health. 2001. pp. 23–31.

[4]. McPherson RA, Khadka N, Moore JM, Sharma M. Are birth-preparedness programmes effective? Results from a field trial in Siraha district, Nepal. Journal of Health Population and Nutrition. 2006; 24(4):479–88. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[5]. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, the World Bank, the United Nations Population Division. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2013. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014.

[6]. World Health Organization. Maternal death surveillance and response: Technical guidance information for action to prevent maternal death. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2013.

[7]. World Health Organization. Women and Health: Today's Evidence, Tomorrow's Agenda. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009.