study aims at determining the impact of the Traditional Marital Counseling Model
(TMCM) on marital distresses among married couples in Ghana. The study adapted versions
of the Session Process and Outcome Measures-Client version (SPOM-C) and the Revised
Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS) questionnaires to measure therapy outcome for 50
married couples who were selected through stratified proportionate random sampling
technique to participate in a descriptive-correlational-experimental research design.
Disparity analyses were done using the Predictive Analytics Software (PASW) 18 guide
to Data Analysis. Descriptive frequencies were used to analyze the data on the levels
of marital distress. Disparity mean values within the sample were measured by paired
t-test technique. Correlation between outcome of therapy for TMCM and level of marital
distress were measured by Pearson correlation coefficient. The study found that
TMCM has a significant effect on the marital distresses of the married couples.
Though TMCM is better for counseling clients with various types of marital distresses,
it is most effective in situations where clients present severe marital distress.
Therapists should use TMCM especially for clients showing sever marital distress.
Keywords: Traditional Marital Counseling
Model (TMCM), Marital Distress, Married Couples, Marriage and Family Counseling,
S. R., Tambling, R. B., Huff, S. C., Heafner, J., Johnson, L. N., &
Ketring, S. A. (2014). The Development of a Reliable Change Index and Cutoff
for the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy,
E. (1990). Survey Research Methods. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
D. H., & Epstein, N. (2013). Cognitive-Behavioral Marital Therapy. New
D. M., Christensen, C., Crane, D. R., & Larson, J. H. (1985). A Revision of
the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for Use with Distressed and Nondistressed Couples:
Construct Hierarchy and Multidimensional Scales. Journal of Marital and Family
J., & Dermer, S. B. (Eds.). (2017). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Marriage,
Family, and Couples Counseling, vol. 4. California: Sage.
W. G. (1952). Sampling Techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
M. J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (Eds.). (2014). Conflict and Cohesion in Families:
Causes and Consequences edited by Martha J. Cox, Jeanne Brooks-Gunn. New York:
D. R., Middleton, K. C., & Bean, R. A. (2000). Establishing Criterion
Scores for the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale and the Revised Dyadic
Adjustment Scale. American Journal of Family Therapy, 28(2), 53–60.
H. Barlow. (2014). Clinical Handbook of Psychological Disorders. (D. H. Barlow,
Ed.) (5th ed.). New York: Guilford.
F. D., & Beach, S. R. (1999). Conflict in Marraige: Implications for
Working with Couples. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 47–77.
F. J. Jr. (1993). Survey Research Methods, vol. 1. London: Sage Publications.
J. O., & Burleson, B. R. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of Communication and
Social Interaction Skills. New York: Taylor & Francis.
W. K. (2003). Brief Therapy for Couples: Helping Partners Help Themselves.
G. T. (1990). Practical sampling, vol. 21. London: Sage Publications.
C. S., Falceto, O. G., Ferreira, L. M., Miller, R. B., Springer, P. R.,
Fernandes, C. L. C., & Nunes, N. A. (2012). Portuguese translation and
validation of the revised dyadic adjustment scale. Journal of Marital and
Family Therapy, 38(1), 348–358.
T. (Ed.). (2013). Family Interaction and Psychopathology: Theories, Methods and
Findings. New York: Springer.
L. (1965). Survey sampling. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
P. (2012). A Reflection on the African Traditional Values of Marriage and
Sexuality. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education
and Development, 1(2), 2226–6348.
J. L., Chambers, A. L., Christensen, A., & Johnson, S. M. (2012). Research
on the Treatment of Couple Distress. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy,
M. S. (1999). Strategies for empirical research in writing. New York: Longman.
D. E. (2002). Marital Distress, Co-Occurring Depression, and Marital Therapy: A
Review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28(3), 299–314.
B., & Mokgolodi, H. L. (2017). Indigenous Marital Therapy: A Case of
Botswana. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 5(11), 66.
A. (2000). Building on the Indigenous: Theory and Method of Marriage Therapy in
Contemporary Eastern and Western Africa. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(4),
H. T., & Sprecher, S. (Eds.). (2009). Encyclopedia of Human Relationships,
vol. 1. California.
M. J. (2008). Every Pot Has a Cover: A Proven System for Finding, Keeping and
Enhancing the Ideal Relationship. Lanham: University Press of America.
C., & Flora, J. (2011). Family Communication (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor
I. E., & Brody, G. H. (Eds.). (1990). Methods of Family Research: Clinical
populations. New York: Psychology Press.
T., Esere, M. O., Gichinga, E. M., & Hove, P. (2010). Journal of Psychology
in Africa Marriage and Counselling in African Communities: Challenges and Counselling
Approaches Marriage and Counselling in African Communities: Challenges and
Counselling Approaches. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 20(2), 335–340.
G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality
of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.
M. N., & Muraru, A. A. (2013). Psychometric properties of the revised
Dyadic Adjustment Scale on a sample of married adults. Journal of Psychological
and Educational Research, 21(1), 49–76.
Acker, E. (2017). Marriage and Values in Public Policy: Conflicts in the UK,
the US and Australia. New York: Taylor & Francis.