Investigate the Factors Contributing to Gender Inequality in Literacy: The Shortfall in boys’ Literacy Development in Primary Schools in the Parish of St. James, Jamaica

Download Article

DOI: 10.21522/TIJAR.2014.12.04.Art033

Authors : Julette Shaw-Williams, Lissett Pickens

Abstract:

This article explores the factors contributing to gender inequality in literacy development among boys in St. James, Jamaica, and the disparities between them and their female counterparts. Using a mixed-method approach, the study gathered qualitative and quantitative data to examine the underlying causes of boys’ underachievement in literacy. The research identified a range of influencing factors, which includes school environment, home support, family background, teaching strategies, and teacher-student relationships. Ethical standards were observed, and the study also addressed its limitations and anticipated outcomes. Findings revealed that gender inequality in literacy remains a persistent concern, both locally and globally. Boys in St. James are particularly disadvantaged due to cultural expectations, limited parental involvement especially from fathers, and classroom practices that often fail to align with their learning preferences. Many boys are expected to adopt adult responsibilities prematurely, such as becoming breadwinners, which hinders their educational progress. Additionally, societal norms surrounding masculinity discourage boys from engaging in reading and writing, which are often perceived as feminine activities. This study concludes that boys face unique challenges that significantly impact their literacy development. These include a lack of male role models in education, limited access to culturally relevant reading materials, and instructional methods that do not accommodate diverse learning styles. The cumulative effect of these challenges results in boys being underserved by the current educational system. Addressing these issues requires targeted policy reform, teacher training, and greater parental and community involvement to foster equitable literacy outcomes for all students.

References:

[1].   Dialnet, 2025, Promoting gender equality in the classroom. Teacher_sChool, 8953813(2). from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es

[2].   DiPrete, T. A., & Buchmann, C., 2013, The rise of women: The growing gender gap in education and what it means for American schools. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

[3].   Cano, G., Hofmeister, H., et al., 2023, Role of parental attitudes and behaviour in the development of adolescents’ gender housework stereotypes. European Sociological Review, 39(2), 112–130.

[4].   Ermisch, J. F., & Francesconi, M., 2001, Family structure and children’s achievements. Journal of Population Economics, 14(2), 249–270.

[5].   Fomby, P., & Cherlin, A. J., 2007, Family instability and child wellbeing. American Sociological Review, 72(2), 181–204.

[6].   Sigle-Rushton, W., & McLanahan, S., 2002, Father absence and child well- being: A critical review. Center for Research on Child Wellbeing Working Paper Series.

[7].   Glock, S., & Kleen, H., 2017, Gender and student misbehavior: Evidence from implicit and explicit measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67(1), 93–103.

[8].   Lundberg, S., 2017, Father absence and the educational gender gap. Institute for Labor Economics (IZA) Discussion Paper Series.

[9].   Mott, F. L., 1994, Sons, daughters and fathers’ absence: Differentials in father leaving probabilities and in home environments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 56(3), 531–541.

[10].  Warrington, M., Younger, M., & Bearne, E., 2006, Raising boys’ achievement in primary schools: Towards a holistic approach. London: Department for Education and Skills.

[11].  Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., & Jak, S., 2012, Are boys better off with male and girls with female teachers? A multilevel investigation of measurement invariance and gender match in teacher–student relationship quality. Journal of School Psychology, 50(3), 363–378.

[12].  Watson, P. W. S. J., Rubie-Davies, C. M., Meissel, K., Peterson, E. R., Flint, A., Garrett, L., & McDonald, L., 2019, Teacher gender and expectations of reading achievement in New Zealand elementary school students: Essentially a barrier? Gender and Education, 31(8), 1000–1019.

[13].  OECD, 2015, The ABC of gender equality in education: Aptitude, behavior and confidence. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264229945-en

[14].  O’Reilly, A., 2021, Gender inequalities in time spent doing housework by children in Ireland: A nationally representative sample across two time points. Infant and Child Development, 30(5), e2237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2237

[15].  Review of Economics of the Household, 2025, The gender gap in children’s educational time investments in informal settlements. SpringerLink. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-025-09785

[16].  Quello, J., & Carlson, B., 2020, Social assessment of Rose II (p. 95 quoted). University Research Press.

[17].  Van Hek, M., Kraaykamp, G., & Wolbers, M. H., 2016, Comparing the gender gap in educational attainment: The impact of emancipatory contexts in 33 cohorts across 33 countries. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(5–6), 260–282.

[18].  Sigle-Rushton, W., 2008, Father absence and child well-being: Additional empirical evidence. Journal of Family Studies, 14(3), 215–230.

[19].  Brookings Institute, 2018, Gender-based violence in primary schools: Jamaican context. Brookings Policy Paper. Retrieved from: https://www.brookings.edu

[20].  Clarke, R., 2007, Ethnographic study of gender beliefs in Jamaican boys, teachers, and parents: Gender identity and academic self-perception. Caribbean Educational Review, 9(1), 45–63.

[21].  Indah, N., 2024, Effectiveness of a mixed-methods-based literacy program in improving reading comprehension, vocabulary mastery, and reading fluency skills of early grade students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(2), 89–105.

[22].  Sechrest, L., & Sidani, S., 1995, Quantitative and qualitative methods: Is there an alternative? Evaluation and Program Planning, 18(1), 77–87.