use of eLearning is changing teaching and learning processes from the sage on
the stage to the guide on the side approach. Students can easily access their
study materials on an eLearning platform regardless of time and space through
digital means. In this research, Post Graduate students of the College of
Distance Education (CoDE) of the university of Cape Coast, offering Business
and Education programmes were assessed on their readiness for the use of the
College of Distance Education’s eLearning platform. A total number of 60
students enrolled for the 2015-2016 Academic Year using the eLearning platform
were sampled for the study. A questionnaire was administered to all of the
students to assess their perceived self efficacy in the use of ICT tools, their
attitude towards eLearning and the perceived barriers to the use of an eLearning
platform. Research findings showed that most students had a positive attitude
towards the use of ICT tools and were ready to use the eLearning platform.
Attwell, G. (2007). The Personal Learning
- the future of eLearning?, eLearning Papers, 2(1).
Bates, A. W. (2005). Technology,
e-learning and distance education (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge
Cruthers, M. (2008). Education technology gives teachers a wider reach. ETNI,
5. Retrieved October 10, 2015, from
Czubaj, C. A. (2004). Literature review: Reported educator concerns regarding
cyberspace curricula. Education, 124(4),
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M.
(2002). The paradox of achievement: The harder you push, the worse it gets. In
J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement (pp. 61-87). New York:
Deniz, L. (2007). İlköğretim Okullarında Görev Yapan Sınıf ve Alan
Öğretmenlerinin Bilgisayar Tutumları. The Turkish ELearning Journal of
Educational Technology, 4(4).
Evans, T. (2000). Flexible delivery and flexible learning: developing flexible
learners? In V. Jakupec, & J. Garrick (Eds.), Flexible learning, human resource
and organizational development (pp. 211–224) London: Routledge.
Habitzel, K., Mark, T., Stehno, B., & Prock, S. (2006). Micro-learning;
Emerging concepts, practices and technologies after e-learning. Proceeding of
Micro learning 2005 Learning & Working in New Media, In conference Series:
Innsbruck University press:
 Kadel, R.
(2005). How teacher attitude affect technology. Learning and Leading with
Technology, 39(5), 34-47.
R. (2008). National Policies that Connect ICT-Based Education reform to Economic
and Social Development, Human Technology, 1(2),
Larreamendy-Joerns, J., &
Leinhardt, G. (2006). Going the distance with eLearning education. Review of
Educational Research, 76(4), 567-605.
 McVay, M. (2001). How to be a successful
distance learning student: Learning on the Internet. New York: Prentice
OECD (2009). Education at a glance: OECD Indicators, Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of
Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578.
Pelgrum, W. & Law, N. (2000). ICT in education around the world: Trends,
problems and prospects, Paris: UNESCO, International Institute for Educational
Saadé, R. G., & Kira, D. (2009). Computer anxiety in e-learning: the effect
of computer self-efficacy. Journal of Information Technology Education, 8,
Schunk, D., Pintrich, M., &
Meece, L. (2008). Self-efficacy and education and instruction. In J. E. Maddux
(Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and
application (pp. 281-303). New York, NY: Plenum Pres.
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R.,
& Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education (3rd ed.). Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Smith, P. J. (2005). Preparedness for flexible delivery among vocational
learners. Distance Education, 21(1), 29–48.
Smith, P. J., Murphy, K. L., & Mahoney, S. E. (2003). Towards identifying
factors underlying readiness for eLearning learning: an exploratory study. Distance
Education, 24(1), 57–67.
Swan, K. (2004). Learning eLearning: a review of current research on issues
of interface, teaching presence and learner characteristics. Paper
presented at the Elements of Quality ELearning Education, Needham, MA.
Tsai, C. C., & Lin, C. C. (2004). Taiwanese adolescents’ perceptions and
attitudes regarding the Internet: exploring gender differences. Adolescence, 39, 725–734.
M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based
science learning: the role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education
and Teaching International, 40(1),
UNESCO. (2004). Open and distance learning: Trends, policy, and strategy
considerations. Paris: UNESCO.
Varank, I. (2006). A comparison of a computer based and a lecture based
computer literacy course: A Turkish case, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,
Science and Technology Education, 2(3),
Warner, D., Christie, G., & Choy, S. (1998). Readiness of VET clients for
flexible delivery including on-line learning. Brisbane: Australian National
Watkins, J. F., & Leigh, S. (2004). Education Evolution: The Need to
Keep Pace with Development of K-12 ELearning Learning. Naperville, IL:
Learning Point Associates.
Yildirim, S. (2000). Current utilization of ICT in Turkish basic education
schools: A review of
Teacher's ICT use and barriers to integration. International Journal of
Instructional Media, Vol. 34,
No.2, pp. 171-86.
 Yuen, H. K.,
& Ma, W. K. (2001). Gender differences in teacher computer acceptance. Journal
of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3), 365-382.