-->

Constituency Development Fund Investments in Primary Health Care: Stakeholder Perspectives from Lufwanyama District, Zambia

Download Article

DOI: 10.21522/TIJAR.2014.13.04.Art003

Authors : Mukuka, J.M., Kooma, E.H.

Abstract:

Zambia's Constituency Development Fund (CDF) provides a decentralised mechanism for financing local priorities, including projects that affect health service delivery. This qualitative single-case study explored stakeholder perspectives on the contribution of CDF investments to primary health care (PHC) in Lufwanyama District, Zambia. It examined stakeholders' understanding of CDF, their participation in implementation processes, and perceived factors that enable or constrain the contribution of Constituency Development Fund investments to Primary Health Care service delivery. In July 2026, 40 purposively selected participants from the local authority, District Health Office, health facilities and community structures took part in semi-structured key-informant and in-depth interviews. Relevant documents were also reviewed, and the data were analysed thematically using deductive and inductive procedures. Participants viewed CDF investments as important service-enabling inputs, particularly facility infrastructure, staff accommodation, maternity spaces, water and sanitation, ambulances, roads, facility rehabilitation and selected equipment. These investments were perceived to improve access, facility readiness and referral systems. Stakeholder-perceived enablers included timely funding, coordination, technical appraisal, community participation, monitoring, alignment with district health priorities and recurrent health-system support. Delayed implementation, procurement challenges, weak coordination, uneven feedback, staffing gaps, medicine shortages and limited recurrent support constrained the translation of completed projects into day-to-day PHC services. CDF should therefore be understood as an enabling financing pathway rather than a complete service-delivery intervention. Its contribution to PHC could be strengthened through alignment with district health priorities, technical review, recurrent health-system inputs, functionality-based monitoring and clearer community feedback and accountability mechanisms.

References:

[1]. World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund. A vision for primary health care in the 21st century: towards universal health coverage and the Sustainable Development Goals [Internet]. Geneva: WHO and UNICEF; 2018 [cited 2026 Jul 1]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/328065.

[2]. World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund. Operational framework for primary health care: transforming vision into action [Internet]. Geneva: WHO and UNICEF; 2020 [cited 2026 Jul 1]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/337641.

[3]. Russell DJ, Zhao Y, Guthridge S, Ramjan M, Jones MP, Humphreys JS, et al. What improves access to primary healthcare services in rural communities? A systematic review. BMC Prim Care. 2022; 23:313. doi:10.1186/s12875-022-01919-0.

[4]. Dolopo A. Assessing the effectiveness of the patient referral system in remote Zambia: a case study of Mbala District. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2026;18(1): e1–e6. doi:10.4102/phcfm.v18i1.5237.

[5]. Schuttner L, Sindano N, Theis M, Zue C, Joseph J, Chilengi R, et al. A mobile phone-based, community health worker program for referral, follow-up, and service outreach in rural Zambia: outcomes and overview. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(8):721–28. doi:10.1089/tmj.2013.0240.

[6]. Ministry of Health. National health strategic plan for Zambia 2022 to 2026: towards attainment of quality universal health coverage through decentralisation [Internet]. Lusaka: Republic of Zambia; 2022 [cited 2026 Jul 3]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/zambia/media/5791/file/MOH-National-Strategic-Plan-2022-2026.pdf.

[7]. Government of the Republic of Zambia. The Constituency Development Fund Act No. 1 of 2024 [Internet]. Lusaka: National Assembly of Zambia; 2024 [cited 2026 Jul 3]. Available from: https://www.parliament.gov.zm/node/11700.

[8]. Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development. Constituency Development Fund guidelines: pursuant to Section 33 of the Constituency Development Fund Act No. 1 of 2024 [Internet]. Lusaka: Government of the Republic of Zambia; 2024 [cited 2026 Jul 4]. Available from: https://www.kaomacouncil.gov.zm/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Constituency Development Fund-Guidelines.pdf.

[9]. World Health Organization. Everybody’s business: strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO’s framework for action [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007 [cited 2026 Jul 4]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/43918.

[10].         World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund. Water, sanitation, hygiene, waste and electricity services in health care facilities: progress on the fundamentals [Internet]. Geneva: WHO and UNICEF; 2023 [cited 2026 Sep 2]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240075085.

[11].         Guo A, Bowling JM, Bartram J, Kayser G. Water, sanitation, and hygiene in rural health-care facilities: a cross-sectional study in Ethiopia, Kenya, Mozambique, Rwanda, Uganda, and Zambia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;97(4):1033–42. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.17-0208.

[12].         Bossert TJ. Analysing the decentralisation of health systems in developing countries: decision space, innovation and performance. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(10):1513–27. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00234-2.

[13].         Bossert TJ, Mitchell AD. Health sector decentralization and local decision-making: decision space, institutional capacities and accountability in Pakistan. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(1):39–48. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.019.

[14].         Abimbola S, Baatiema L, Bigdeli M. The impacts of decentralization on health system equity, efficiency and resilience: a realist synthesis of the evidence. Health Policy Plan. 2019;34(8):605–17. doi:10.1093/heapol/czz055.

[15].         Zon H, Pavlova M, Drabo KM, Groot W. Municipal health services provision by local governments: a systematic review of experiences in decentralized Sub-Saharan African countries. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32(9):1327–36. doi:10.1093/heapol/czx082.

[16].         Sapkota S, Dhakal A, Rushton S, van Teijlingen E, Simkhada P. The impact of decentralisation on health systems: a systematic review of reviews. BMJ Glob Health. 2023;8(12): e013317. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013317.

[17].         Lodenstein E, Mafuta E, Kpatchavi AC, Servais J, Dieleman M, Broerse JEW, et al. Social accountability in primary health care in West and Central Africa: exploring the role of health facility committees. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):403. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2344-7.

[18].         Madon S, Krishna S. Theorizing community health governance for strengthening primary healthcare in LMICs. Health Policy Plan. 2022;37(6):723–30. doi:10.1093/heapol/czac002.

[19].         Zulu JM, Kamanga A, Ngosa L, Shakwelele H, Mulenga W, Chihinga R, et al. Community participation through co-production and social accountability in Zambia: mapping primary health care actors, roles and interfaces. J Community Syst Health. 2024;1(1). doi:10.36368/jcsh. v1i1.1054.

[20].         Schaaf M, Topp SM, Ngulube M. From favours to entitlements: community voice and action and health service quality in Zambia. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32(6):847–59. doi:10.1093/heapol/czx024.

[21].         Casey K, Rodriguez AF, Sacchetto C, Wani S. Zambia’s Constituency Development Fund: policy considerations [Internet]. London: International Growth Centre; 2021 [cited 2026 Jul 5]. Available from: https://www.theigc.org/sites/default/files/2022/01/Casey-et-al-Policy-paper-December2021_web.pdf.

[22].         Chambaka A, Mutono-Mwanza BG. Effectiveness of the Constituency Development Fund accountability framework in service delivery: evidence from Chawama and Kanyama constituencies, Lusaka, Zambia. Manag J Adv Res. 2026;6(2). doi:10.54741/MJAR/6.2.2026.303.

[23].         Chama KW. The delivery of health services in the Zambian decentralised system: a case study of Lusaka District [Internet]. Lusaka: University of Zambia; 2012 [cited 2026 Jul 5]. Available from: https://dspace.unza.zm/items/e6191a51-ced7-48ae-a4de-0b4850a0308b/full.

[24].         Sichone C, Ahmad Dar A. Decentralising the health sector in Zambia: an observational study. Int Health Trends Perspect. 2025;5(3):GR14–22. doi:10.32920/ihtp. v5i3.2622.

[25].         Chanda JA, Mugala A. Exploring challenges and opportunities in the Constituency Development Fund utilisation for optimizing maternal and child health outcomes: a qualitative study in Vubwi Constituency. Int J Innov Sci Res Technol. 2026;11(7). doi:10.38124/ijisrt/26jul1434.

[26].         Sofaer S. Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them? Health Serv Res [Internet]. 1999 [cited 2026 Jul 6];34(5 Pt 2):1101–18. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1089055/.

[27].         Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2018.

[28].         Yin RK. Case study research and applications: design and methods. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2018.

[29].         Bowen GA. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J. 2009;9(2):27–40. doi:10.3316/QRJ0902027.

[30].         Sandelowski M. Sample size in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health. 1995;18(2):179–83. doi:10.1002/nur.4770180211.

[31].         Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

[32].         Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications; 1985.