-->

Contextual Factors Undermining Community Health Worker Data Systems During Health Emergencies in Zimbabwe: A Cross-Cadre Survey Analysis

Download Article

DOI: 10.21522/TIJAR.2014.13.04.Art018

Authors : Tafadzwa Dzamara

Abstract:

Community health workers (CHWs) are central to community surveillance and primary health care in Zimbabwe, yet the data systems supporting their work are especially vulnerable during epidemics, cyclones and other health emergencies. This study examined the contextual factors undermining the collection, transmission, verification and use of CHW data during health emergencies in Zimbabwe between 2018 and 2025 and identified priorities for strengthening system resilience. A cross-sectional, multi-cadre structured survey was administered through Kobo Toolbox to 142 respondents across eleven cadres spanning the community, facility, district and provincial levels of the health system. Respondents reported near-universal involvement in emergency-related data work (95.0%) and described data roles as clearly defined (89.3%), but only 67.1% could still transmit data when electricity or internet connectivity failed. Data collection was the most disrupted stage of the CHW data pathway (30.7%), and tools and devices (67.6%) together with power and connectivity (58.5%) were the factors most often blamed for undermining continuity. Only 33.6% rated emergency-specific training as adequate, and overall data timeliness and quality was rated good or very good by 48.6% of respondents, falling to 40% among community-level respondents. Respondents' priorities for the Ministry of Health and Child Care centred on infrastructure investment (32.9%) and workforce training (30.0%). The findings indicate that Zimbabwe's community health information system is broadly functional at its technical core but remains constrained at the point of community-level data capture, pointing to sequenced, practical investment priorities for strengthening emergency-responsive CHW data systems.

References:

[1].   Bogale TN, Teklehaimanot SM, Fufa Debela T, Enyew DB, Nigusse Bedada A, Dufera Kebebew S, et al. Barriers, facilitators and motivators of electronic community health information system use among health workers in Ethiopia. Front Digit Health. 2023;5:1162239. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1162239

[2].   Ministry of Health and Child Care Zimbabwe. National Health Strategy 2026-2030. Harare: Government of Zimbabwe; 2026.

[3].   World Vision International. A new era in public health emergency preparedness and response in Zimbabwe. Harare: World Vision International Zimbabwe; 2025. Available from: https://wvi.org/stories/zimbabwe/new-era-public-health-emergency-preparedness-and-response-zimbabwe

[4].   Degaga SD, Yesuf SS, Aweke GT. Implementation of the electronic community health information system in rural East Shewa zone, Eastern Ethiopia: a CFIR-ERIC framework for facilitators, barriers and implementation strategies. Front Digit Health. 2025;7:1554995. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1554995

[5].   Mashe T, Chaibva BV, Nair P, Sani KA, Jallow M, Tarupiwa A, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of the cholera outbreak in Zimbabwe 2018-2019: role of multi-sectorial approach in cholera epidemic control. BMJ Open. 2023;13(1):e059134. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059134

[6].   World Health Organization. Strengthening health emergency prevention, preparedness, response and resilience. Geneva: WHO; 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/strengthening-the-global-architecture-for-health-emergency-prevention--preparedness--response-and-resilience

[7].   World Health Organization. Zimbabwe: data-driven decisions maintain availability and access to essential health services during the COVID-19 response. Geneva: WHO Universal Health Coverage Partnership; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/zimbabwe-data-driven-decisions-maintain-availability-and-access-to-essential-health-services-during-the-covid-19-response

[8].   Ballard M, Olsen HE, Millear A, Yang J, Whidden C, Yembrick A, et al. Continuity of community-based healthcare provision during COVID-19: a multicountry interrupted time series analysis. BMJ Open. 2022;12(5):e052407. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052407

[9].   Namuhani N, Babirye Z, Monje F, Salawu MM, Bosonkie M, Bello S, et al. Leveraging community health workers for COVID-19 response in Democratic Republic of Congo, Nigeria, Senegal, and Uganda: roles, barriers, and facilitators. BMC Prim Care. 2024;25(1):269. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02531-0

[10].  Simbini T, Adimado E, Adjorlolo S, Guerrero-Torres L, Srinivas P, Zizhou S, et al. Digital health interventions in strengthening primary healthcare systems in sub-Saharan Africa: insights from Ethiopia, Ghana and Zimbabwe. PLOS Digit Health. 2026;5(1):e0000863. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000863

[11].  The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Zimbabwe digital health case study. Geneva: The Global Fund; 2025. Available from: https://www.theglobalfund.org/media/qksld2tg/publication_zimbabwe-digital-health_casestudy_en.pdf

[12].  Olatunji G, Kokori E, Moradeyo A, Olatunji D, Ajibola F, Otolorin O, et al. A perspective on the 2023 cholera outbreaks in Zimbabwe: implications, response strategies, and policy recommendations. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2024;14(1):243-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197-023-00165-6

[13].  International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Zimbabwe: cholera outbreak response, DREF Operation MDRZW021. Geneva: IFRC; 2023. Available from: https://reliefweb.int/report/zimbabwe/zimbabwe-cholera-outbreak-response-dref-operation-mdrzw021

[14].  World Health Organization. Health systems resilience toolkit: a WHO global public health good to support building and strengthening of sustainable health systems resilience in countries with various contexts. Geneva: WHO; 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240048751

[15].  Kok MC, Kane SS, Tulloch O, Ormel H, Theobald S, Dieleman M, et al. How does context influence performance of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries? Evidence from the literature. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13:13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0001-3

[16].  Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. London: Sage Publications; 2021.

[17].  Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1-13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

[18].  Taherdoost H. Sampling methods in research methodology: how to choose a sampling technique for research. Int J Acad Res Manag. 2016;5(2):18-27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035

[19].  Yusoff MSB. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Educ Med J. 2019;11(2):49-54. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6

[20].  World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa. Easing COVID-19 impact on key health services. Brazzaville: WHO Regional Office for Africa; 2020. Available from: https://www.afro.who.int/news/easing-covid-19-impact-key-health-services

[21].  Kapsule. Digital health in Africa: trends, investment, and impact. Kapsule Technologies; 2026.