The Dark Side of Trust: When Stakeholder Pressure Undermines Academic Integrity in International Schools
Abstract:
Trust is one of those elements that glue between governance and stakeholders in fee-paying international schools which we should take into account. As we already understand, trust has ever been a positive institutional strength never taking into account the fact that it can be misdirected and thus can even assume a negative direction. This article attempts to attempt to comprehend the extent to which trust can be twisted and can, therefore, be labeled as a negative and not a positive aspect in the international educational environment. Considering a conceptual review of 23 sources (organized in a systematic way) on educational leadership, stakeholder theory, legitimacy, quality assurance and commercialization, this writing argues on a hypothesis that trust itself can shift into the category of a negative glue between school and investors to a far more negativized form whereby there is, as a core element, parents who place financial pressure on schools. The review introduces two conceptual innovations in categorizing the ideas of healthy trust and distorted trust and three most prevalent areas of risk found by the review grade inflation, partiality in admissions and in school progression, and compromised leadership. Our findings revealed that stakeholder satisfaction does not provide an automatic assurance of a financial guarantee in the long-term; this is rather a result of developing inflexible protective barriers in the school environment.References:
[1]. Hayden M, Thompson J. International schools: growth and influence.
Paris: UNESCO; 2013. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/
[2]. Bunnell T. The changing landscape of international schooling:
implications for theory and practice. London: Routledge; 2016.
[3]. Hill I. Internationally minded schools, global mobility and educational
change. J Res Int Educ. 2015;14(1):5–17.
[4]. Bates R. Schooling internationally: globalisation, internationalisation
and the future for international schools. Lond Rev Educ. 2011;9(1):11–29.
[5]. Council of International Schools. CIS code of ethics [Internet]. 2024.
Available from: https://www.cois.org/about-cis/code-of-ethics
[6]. New England Association of Schools and Colleges. Standards for
accreditation: international schools [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.neasc.org/accreditation/standards/international
[7]. International Baccalaureate Organization. Rules for IB World Schools:
Diploma Programme [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://ibo.org/
[8]. Bryk AS, Schneider B. Trust in schools: a core resource for improvement.
New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2002.
[9]. Tschannen-Moran M. Trust matters: leadership for successful schools. 2nd
ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2014.
[10]. Hoy WK, Tschannen-Moran M. The conceptualization and measurement of
faculty trust in schools: the omnibus T-scale. In: Hoy WK, Miskel CG, editors.
Studies in leading and organizing schools. Charlotte: Information Age
Publishing; 2003.
[11]. Freeman RE. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston:
Pitman; 1984.
[12]. Suchman MC. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches.
Acad Manage Rev. 1995;20(3):571–610. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
[13]. Fullan M. Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass;
2001.
[14]. Ball SJ. Education plc: understanding private sector participation in
public sector education. London: Routledge; 2007.
[15]. Bottery M. The ethics of educational management. London: Cassell; 1992.
[16]. Grey C, Garsten C. Trust, control and post-bureaucracy. Organ Stud.
2001;22(2):229–250.
[17]. Harvey L, Green D. Defining quality. Assess Eval High Educ.
1993;18(1):9–34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102
[18]. Sallis E. Total quality management in education. 3rd ed. London:
Routledge; 2014.
[19]. Eaton JS. An overview of U.S. accreditation. Washington, DC: Council for
Higher Education Accreditation; 2015.
[20]. Naidoo R. Rethinking development: higher education and the new
imperialism. In: Molesworth M, Scullion R, Nixon E, editors. The marketisation
of higher education and the student as consumer. London: Routledge; 2011. p.
62–74.
[21]. Brown R. The marketisation of higher education: issues and ironies. In:
Molesworth M, Scullion R, Nixon E, editors. The marketisation of higher
education and the student as consumer. London: Routledge; 2011. p. 11–24.
[22]. O’Neill O. A question of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;
2002.
[23]. Bush T. Theories of educational leadership and management. 4th ed. London: Sage; 2011.
