Relationship between Corporate Governance and Financial Performance in Multi-Purpose Co-Operative Societies, Lagos, Nigeria

Download Article

DOI: 10.21522/TIJMG.2015.03.02.Art016

Authors : Akinade Simeon Adebisi

Abstract:

In the light of corporate financial scandals, there is an ever increasing attention on corporate governance issues. As the investors look for emerging economies to diversify their investment portfolios to maximize returns, they are equally concerned about governance factors to minimize risks in these economies. The Government of Nigeria and other stakeholders have therefore directed their effort in enhancing Corporate Governance in various organizations. This became the motivation of this study, which is focused on examining the relationship between Corporate Governance and Financial Performance of multipurpose Cooperative Societies in Lagos State Nigeria. A cross sectional research design was used for the research study, with the aid of secondary data. The purposive sampling techniques were adopted for the study. Two (2) multipurpose Cooperative Societies were selected based on the availability of their financial statements. The data obtained were analyzed using the STATA software. From the analyses, it was established that, Corporate Governance has no significant effect on the financial performance of these multipurpose Cooperative Societies. However, it impacted positively on diligence of procedures, records kept and conduct of daily business. The researcher however opined that the radical improvement noticed in the level of governance and financial ethics introduced by the various regulatory authorities should be maintained at all levels of stewardship in organizations.

References:

[1]. Adu, C. A. (2014). Cooperative societies in Nigeria: prospects and problems. International Journal of Behavioral Social and Movement Sciences, 3(3).

[2]. Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. The Academy of Management Review, 447-465.

[3]. Bhagat, S., Bolton, B. J., Romano, R., (2007). The promise and peril of corporate governance indices. ECGI - Law Working Paper No. 89/2007.

[4]. Boyd, B.K. (1994). Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal 15.

[5]. Bozec, R., Dia, M., & Bozec, Y. (2010). Governance – performance relationship: A re-examination using technical efficiency measures. British Journal of Management, 21, 684–700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00624.

[6]. Brasilia (2008).Corporate governance: Guidelines for Good Practices of Financial Cooperative Governance.

[7]. Brennan, N. (2006). Boards of directors and firm performance: Is there expectations gap/Corporate governance: An International Review, 14(6), 577-593.

[8]. Bye-Laws 2003.

[9]. Deakin & Hughes (1997).

[10].  Ehikioya, B. (2009). Corporate governance structure and firm performance in developing economies: evidence from Nigeria. Q Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 9(3), 231-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14720700910964307.

[11].  Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control, Journal of Law and Economics, 301-326.

[12].  Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D., 1989. Chief executive Compensation: a study of the intersection of markets and political processes. Strategic Management Journal 10, 121-134.

[13].  García-Sánchez, I. M. (2010). The effectiveness of corporate governance: board structure and business technical efficiency in Spain. CEJOR, 18, 311–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10100-009-0112-4.

[14].  Hermalins, B. E. and Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature, Economic Policy Review 9(1), 7−26.

[15].  Islam, M. Z., Islam, M. N., Bhattacharjee, S., & Islam, A. Z. (2009). Agency problem and the role of audit committee: Implications for corporate sector in Bangladesh. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(3), 177.

[16].  Jensen, M., Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.

[17].  Jensen, M. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 48, 831-880.

[18].  Jonsson, F.I. (2005). The role model of the board: A preliminary study of the roles of Iceland board. Corporate governance: An International Review, 13(5), 710-717.

[19].  Lambert, R., Larcker, D., Weigelt, K. (1993). The structure of organizational incentives. Administrative Science Quarterly 38, 438-461.

[20].  Maria M., Thomas A. Corporate governance: effects on firm performance and economic growth.1999. Pg 5-7.

[21].  Mayer, C. (1997). New issues in corporate governance. European Economic. Review 32, 1167-1188.

[22].  Metrick and Ishii (2002).

[23].  Muamba, G. M. (2005). An assessment of the impact of co-operative society loan to small scale and medium enterprises in Kenya. Research Thesis, Jomo Kenyatta University, Nairobi.

[24].  Mudibo, E. k. (2005). Corporate governance in co-operatives, the east Africa.

[25].  Mutunga E.K. (2009).Study of corporate governance practices and challenges by co-operative societies in NAIROBI (A study of selected Co-operative Societies in Nairobi.

[26].  Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (2005). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(12), 1128–1263.

[27].  Nguyen, B. D., & Nielsen, K. M. (2010). The value of independent directors: Evidence from sudden deaths. Journal of Financial Economics, 98(3), 550-567.

[28].  O’Sullivan, A., & Sheffrin S.M. (2003). Economics: Principles in action .Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Pearson. Prentice Hall.

[29].  Proceedings Report, 2007.

[30].  Rouf, M. A. (2011). The relationship between corporate governance and value of the firm in developing countries: Evidence from Bangladesh. The International Journal of Applied Economics and Finance, 5(3), 237–244.

[31].  Salami, K. A. (2011). Analysis of the relationship between share ownership structure, corporate governance structure, and corporate investment efficiency, using GSE Market Data (2005-9). Journal of Accounting and Finance, 11(4), 111-118.

[32].  Sekhar, M. A. (n.d). Corporate governance and firms ‘financial performance. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics.

[33].  Sheu, H., & Yang, C. (2005). Insider ownership structure and firm performance: A productivity perspective study in Taiwan’s electronics industry. Corporate Governance, 13(2), 326–337.

[34].  Siagian, F. T., & Tresnaningsih, E. (2011). The impact of independent directors and independent audit committees on earnings quality reported by Indonesian firms. Asian Review of Accounting, 19(3), 192-207.

[35].  Sørensen, R. J. (2007). Does dispersed public ownership impair efficiency? The case of refuse collection in Norway. Public administration, 85(4), 1045-1058.

[36].  https://hbr.org/2013/11/what-weve-learned-from-the-financial-crisis.