Lumbar Radiculopathy: Results of Grade 3 And 4 Vertical Oscillatory Pressure (VOP) In Pain Management In A 32-Year-Old Female. A Case Report

Download Article


Authors : Olukayode O Alewi

Abstract:

Chronic low back pain is prevalent in the western world. Lumbar radiculopathy is a common presentation in physical therapy daily practice.4 Large epidemiological studies show that: “20 to 30% of patients with chronic back pain suffer from a neuropathic pain component”.4,7 Its diagnosis and management remain an enigma. There is no conclusive evidence for the long-term efficacy of spinal manipulation for any type of low back pain.3 There is no evidence that describes the efficacy of vertical oscillatory pressure (VOP) in the management of pain resulting from lumbar radiculopathy either. The few articles that report the effect of VOP did not quantify the intensity (grading) of the applied thrust to the spine.3 This case report describes and observe the result of applying a submaximal and maximal central posterior-anterior thrust (grade 3 and 4) vertical oscillatory pressure to the lumbar spine in a 32-year-old female with lumbar radiculopathy. In his prospective study, Onuwe observed a statistically significant difference in pain perception before and after vertebral mobilization.13 The purpose of this case report was to describe and observe the result of VOP in pain management of a 32-year-old female with lumbar radiculopathy.

References:

1.      Boonstra AM, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Reneman MF, Posthumus JB, Stewart RE. Reliability and validity of the visual analog scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Int J Rehabil Res. 2008; 31(2): 165-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1846793. Accessed November 19, 2012.

2.      Briggs DR. The Straight Leg Raise Test. Dynamic Chiropractic. 2012; 30(23). http://www.dynamicchiropractic.com/mpacms. Accessed November 2, 2012.

3.      Bronfort G. Spinal Manipulation: Current State of Reasearch and its indications. 1999; 17(1): 91-111.doi: 10.1016/s0733-8619(05) 70116-x

4.      Colloca CJ, Keller TS, Gunzburg R. Biomechanical and neurophysiological responses to spinal manipulation in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. Journal of Manipulation and Physiological Therapeutics. 2004; 27(1);1-15. Doi: 10.101b/j.jmpt.2003.11.021.

5.      Cox JM, Davison A. The visual analog scale as a tool for self-reporting of subjective phenomena in the medical radiation sciences. Education Today. 2012; 12(3). http://www.minniscomms.com.au/educationto. Accessed October 30, 2012.

6.      Einhaupl KM, Failli V, Klingebiel R, Pruss H, Schwab JM, Siebert E. Lumbar spinal stenosis: Syndrome, diagnostics and treatments. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2009; 5(7): 392. Doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.90

7.      Freynhagen R, Baron R. The evaluation of neuropathic components in low back pain. Current Pain and Headache Reports. 2009;13(3): 185-190. Doi: 10.1007/s11916-009-0032-y.

8.      Goodman CC, Synder TEK. Differential Diagnosis for Physical Therapists: Screening for Referral. St. Louis, Missouri: Sanders Elsevier, 2007.

9.      Hall SJ. Fundamentals of Maitland Mobilizations. Morphopedics. http://morphopedics.wikidot.com/fundamentals. Accessed September 30, 2012.

10.  Leininger B, Bronfort G, Evans R, Reiter T. Spinal manipulation or mobilization for radiculopathy: a systematic review. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2011; 22(1); 105-25. http://www.ncbi.nlm-nih.gov/pubmed/2129214. Epubished 30 December 2010. Accessed November 30 2012.

11.  Maitland GD. Maitland’s Vertebral Manipulation. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2005.

12.  Moore KL, Dally AF. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. 5TH edition. Baltimore: Lippincolt Williams & Wilkins; 2006.

13.  Onuwe HAK. Relative therapeutic efficiency of vertebrae mobilization technique in the management of mechanical low back pain. Journal of Medicine in the Tropics. 2004: 6(2).

14.  Oswestry Disability Index: Version 2.0. http://www.chirogeek.com/001_oswestry_20.htm. Accessed September 21, 2012.

15.  Rabin A, gerszten PC, Karausky P, Bunker CH, Potter DM, Welch WC. The sensitivity of the seated staright-leg raise test compared with the supine straight-leg raise test in patients presenting with magnetic resonance imaging evidence of lumbar nerve root compression. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88(7):840-3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1760146. Accessed October 25, 2012.

16.  Rehab Students. Straight Leg Raise (SLR) Test. http://videos.rehabstudents.com/straight-leg-ra. Updated April 10, 2010. Accessed November 10, 2012.

17.  Sheffinger MA, Najim WI, Mishra SI. Reliability of Spinal Palpation for Diagnosis of Back and Neck Pain: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Spine. 2004; 29(19): 413-425. http://www.westrenupatientcarecenter.com/bin/. Accessed November 3, 2012.

18.  Sipila VP. The Rationale for Joint Mobilization as a Manual Technique. http://www.orthosportonline.com/veli-s-Corne. Accessed November 19, 2012.

19.  Sizer PS jr, Phelps V, Matthijs O. Pain Generators of the Lumbar Spine. Pain Practice. 2001; 1(3): 255-273.doi:10.1111/j.1533-2500.2001.01027.x