The study examined the relationship
between work system, workplace hazards and employees behaviour. It aimed at
addressing the issue of how work can be structured in order to reduce workplace
hazards and produce affirmative employee’s work behavior.
The study uses survey research method.
Participants in the study were 120 staffs of Nigerian Eagle Flourmill, Ibadan
who were selected through stratified and simple random sampling techniques.
Data were collected via responses elicited using the questionnaire instrument.
Results show that there is a significant relationship between work system,
workplace hazards and employees behaviour. The findings were discussed with
reference to relevant empirical literatures, and with recommendations for
management of organizations both for practice and future research highlighted.
Work system, workplace hazard, employees,
2008. Decent work and global strategy on occupational safety and Health on
Guard Sustainable Safety and Health Practice. Vol 15 (1): 7-13
Fajemonyomi, M., Jinadu M. and Bogunjoko 1993. A Case Study of Occupation
Health Problems of a Match Industry in Nigeria. Nigerian School Health Journal
Vol. 8(1) pp: 3) Alter, S. 2006.The work system Method: Connecting People,
Processes and IT for Business Results. Working System Press. Larkspur, CA.
Ceilo, P. Zanuttini, R. 1999.Risks for the workers in plywood manufacturing: A
case study in Italy. Journal of Forest Engineering10 (2):12-15
Bello, R. 2010.
Assessment of injuries in small scale sawmilling industry of south western
Nigeria. University of Ibadan, Nigeria
Cherns, A., 1987.
Principles of Sociotechnical Design Revisted. Human Relations. Vol. 40(3): p.
2006. Manufacturing Systems: Theory and Practice, 2nd Edition, Springer Verlag,
1997. Lean Production: Denial, Confirmation or Extension of Sociotechnical
Systems Design? Human relations, Vol.50(5): p. 567.
Erickson, J.B., Delbos, R.G., and Banks, S.M 2005. The impact of overtime and
long work hours on occupational injuries and illnesses: new evidence from the
United States. Occup Environ Med 62:588-597.
Emery, F., 1977.
The Assembly Line -Its logic and Our Future, in The Socio-Technical Systems
Perspective, E.L. Trist, Editor.
[10.] Emery, F.E., 1993. The Nine Step Model, in The
Socio-Technical Systems Perspective, E.L. Trist and H. Murray, Editors.
[11.] Empirical Study towards the effects of Team and
New Technology, Work, and Employment, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 191-203.
[12.] Fagboungbe, B.O., Akinbode, G.A., Ayodeji, F. 2012.
Gender and organizational factors as determinants of workplace fraudulent
behaviours in Nigeria: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Business
Trends and Technology.Vol.2 (2), pp: 11-21
[13.] Igor A. 1998. Health Promotion in the work place: An
international Journal of health development. Vol. 19(4):390-396.
[14.] Kalejaiye, P. O. 2013. Occupational health and safety:
Issues, challenges and compensation in Nigeria. Peak Journal of Public Health
and Management Vol.1 (2), pp. 16-23
[15.] Kiwekete, H.M. 2010. Psychosocial risk
assessments-ensuring the well-being of employees. African Newsletter on Occupational
Health and Safety. 20 (2):38-40.
[16.] Landsbergis, P.A. 2003. The changing organization of
work and the safety and health of working people: A commentary. J Occup Environ
[17.] Landsbergis, P.A., Cahill, J., and Schnall, P. 1999.
The impact of lean production and related new systems of work organization on
worker health. J Occup Health Psychol 4(2):108-130
[18.] Major, S.M., Klein, K.J., and Ehrhart, M.G. 2002. Work
time, work interference with family, and psychological stress. J Appl Psychol
[19.] Meswani, H. R. 2008. Safety and Occupational Health;
Challenges and Opportunities in emerging economies. Indian Journal of
Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Vol. 12: No.
[20.] 1: 3-9.
[21.] National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
2002. The Changing Organization of Work and the Safety and Health of Working
People. NIOSH Publication No. 2002-116.
[22.] Niepce, W. and Molleman, E.1998. Work Design Issues in
Lean Production from a Sociotechnical Systems Perspective: Neo-Taylorism or the
Next Step in Sociotechnical Design? Human Relations. Vol. 51(3): p. 259-287.
[23.] Onyeonoru, I. P. 2005. Industrial sociology in Africa
context. Ibadan: Samlad Press.
[24.] Otobo, D. 2000. Industrial Relations. Theory and
Controversies. Lagos Malt house press Ltd.
[25.] Pruijt, H. 2003. Teams between Neo-Taylorism and
Anti-Taylorism. Economic and industrial democracy. Vol. 24(1): p. 77.
[26.] Rask K and Johansson, J. 2008. Similarities and
Differences between Lean Production, Tayloristic and Socio-Technical Systems
Revealed in the Methodology Characteristics Map Department of Human Work
Science, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
[27.] Steijn, B. 2001. „Work systems, Quality of Working
Life and Attitudes of Workers. An
[28.] Swaen, G.M.H., van Amelsvoort, L.P.G.M., Bultmann, U.,
Slangen, J.J.M., and Kant, I.J. 2004. Psychosocial work characteristics as risk
factors for being injured in an occupational accident. J. Occup Environ Med
[29.] Taylor, F.W., 1998. The Principles of Scientific
Management. 1911, Dover Publications.
[30.] Van der Hulst, M. 2003. Long working hours and health.
Scand J Work Environ Health 29(3):171-188.
[31.] Womack, J.P. and D.T. Jones, 2003. Lean Thinking:
banish waste and create wealth in your corporation.
[32.] Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T. and Roos, D. 1990. The
machine that changed the world. 1
Organization 2004. Guidelines for conducting community surveys on injuries and
violence 2004. 34) World Health Organization. Occupational Health Programs