The Impact of Employee Engagement on Organization’s Productivity on United Methods on Relief Services
Abstract:
Employee engagement has arisen as a widespread organizational perception in current years. It is the level of strength of mental and emotional connection employees feel toward their workplaces and its values and beliefs. When employees are engaged and aware of the business framework and work as a team to improve performance within the job for the advantage of the organization. Employee engagement resourcefulness has a straight effect on the organization's level of production. Every company/ organization requires their workers to be engaged in their respective work. Employee engagement is linked to customer satisfaction which is connected to an organization's financial success. Engagement arises when adequate individuals give attention to performing good work and care concerned about what the company is thriving to attain and in what way it is an accomplishment. This helpful mentality and behavior only arise once people get satisfied with their jobs they do and are convinced that the organization supports them, with an effective HR manager. This paper covers a literature review from several study findings and practices employed by the use of an expressive research method. It schemes the effect of worker’s engagement on the productivity of the organization. It also showcased the factors affecting the worker’s assignation and organizational results.References:
[1]
Sanchez, P. M. (2007) ‘The employee survey: More than asking
questions’, Journal of Business Strategy, pp. 48–56. doi:
10.1108/02756660710732657.
[2]
Shajahan, S. (1992) ‘Introduction to Business Research
Methods: S. Shajahan: 9788184950335: Amazon.com: Books’, in Introduction to
Business Research Methods, p. 254. Available at: https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Business-Research-Methods-Shajahan/dp/8184950330
(Accessed: 14 April 2021).
[3]
Chummun, B. Z. (2012) Evaluating business success in the
Microinsurance industry of South Africa.
[4] Field, A. (2013) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics And Sex and Drugs and Rock “N” Roll, 4th Edition, Sage, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi. - References - Scientific Research Publishing’, in Field A, p. 724. Available at:
https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=2046660
(Accessed: 14 April 2021).
[5]
Cortina, J. M. (1993) ‘Interaction, Nonlinearity, and
Multicollinearity: implications for Multiple Regression’, Journal of
Management. Sage PublicationsSage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA, 19(4), pp.
915–922. doi: 10.1177/014920639301900411.
[6] Taylor, R. F. (2004)
‘Extending Conceptual Boundaries: Work, Voluntary Work and Employment’, Work,
Employment and Society. SAGE Publications, 18(1), pp. 29–49. doi:
10.1177/0950017004040761.
[7] Hubert Gatignon (2003) ‘Statistical Analysis of Management Data | Hubert GATIGNON | Springer’, in Statistical Analysis of Management Data. Available at:
https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780306481659 (Accessed:
14 April 2021).
[8] Hewitt
Associates, L. (2004): Hewitt Associates, L., 2004. Research Brief: employee
engagement higher at double digit growth companies. [Online] Available at: www.hewitt.com
[Accessed 25 March 2013]. Available at: http://www.sciepub.com/reference/136842
(Accessed: 14 April 2021).
[9]
Rothbard, N. P. (2001) ‘Enriching or Depleting? The Dynamics
of Engagement in Work and Family Roles Part of the Human Resources Management
Commons, and the Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons’. doi:
10.2307/3094827.
[10] Bush, J. B. and Frohman, A. L.
(1991) ‘Communication in a “network” organization’, Organizational Dynamics,
20(2), pp. 23–36. doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(91)90069-L.
[11]
Meyer, J. P. et al. (2002) ‘Affective, continuance,
and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents,
correlates, and consequences’, Journal of Vocational Behavior. Academic
Press Inc., 61(1), pp. 20–52. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842.
[12] Coopey, J. and Hartley, J.
(1991) ‘Reconsidering The Case For Organisational Commitment’, Human
Resource Management Journal. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1(3), pp. 18–32.
doi: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.1991.tb00228.x.
[13] Bames, J. et al. (2012)
‘Letter to the Editor: Standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary
behaviours”’, Applied Physiology Nutrition And Metabolism-Physiologie
Appliquee Nutrition Et Metabolisme. National Research Council, 37, pp.
540–542. Available at: https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/letter-to-the-editor-standardized-use-of-the-terms-sedentary-and-
(Accessed: 14 April 2021).
[14]
Kahn, W. A. (1990) ‘Psychological conditions of personal
engagement and disengagement at work’, Academy of Management Journal.
Academy of Management, 33(4), pp. 692–724. doi: 10.5465/256287.
[15] Postmes, T. et al.
(2001) ‘Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Effects of
Anonymity on Group Behavior’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
SAGE Publications Inc., 27(10), pp. 1243.
[16] Butler, J. K. and Cantrell, R.
S. (1994) ‘Communication Factors and Trust: An Exploratory Study’, Psychological
Reports. SAGE Publications, 74(1), pp. 33–34. doi:
10.2466/pr0.1994.74.1.33.
[17]
Jamrog, J. J. and Overholt, M. H. (2004) ‘Measuring HR and
organizational effectiveness’, Employment Relations Today. Wiley, 31(2),
pp. 33–45. doi: 10.1002/ert.20015.
[18] Chen, L. Y. (2006) ‘Leadership
Behaviors and Knowledge Sharing in Professional Service Firms Engaged in
Strategic Alliances’, Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship,
11(2), p. 51–1254. doi: 10.1177/01461672012710001.
[19]
Schaufeli, W. et al. (2002) ‘The Measurement of
Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach’, Journal
of Happiness studies. Springer, 3(1), pp. 71–92. doi:
10.1023/A:1015630930326.
