Supervisor-Supervisee Relations and Job Performance: Study of Healthcare Field Officers in Chongwe, Zambia

Download Article

DOI: 10.21522/TIJAR.2014.09.03.Art011

Authors : Dalitso Maseko

Abstract:

The power of praise in the workplace can move employees from apathy or resentment to happiness and productivity. Reinforcement such as positive reinforcement makes people feel appreciated and encouraged, which can be motivating and rewarding. An observational study aimed at examining the relationship between motivation and employee performance using through the lens of the Reinforcement Theory of Motivation on Job Performance was conducted on a Team of Healthcare Field Workers. Purposive sampling of twenty (20) Healthcare Field Workers from Chongwe Rural District of Zambia was done with whom a series of both negative and positive reinforcement strategies were applied. The final outcome of the study revealed a significant positive change from 5% to 30% of the overall staff performance on the targets in just four (4) weeks. Such an outcome definitely demonstrated that by using a system of positive or negative reinforcements, individuals could learn the correct set of responses for any given stimulus.

Keywords: Behavior, Modification, Reinforcement.

References:

[1] Bernard, C.K. (1968) The functions of the Executive. Harvard University Press.

[2] Argris, C. (1964) Integrating the individual and the organization. New York. John Willy & Sons.

[3] McLeod, S. A. (2018) Skinner - operant conditioning. Simply Psychology. www.simplypsychology.org/operant-conditioning.html.

[4] Thorndike, E. L. (1898) Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 2(4), i-109.

[5] Albarracín, D. et al. (2005) A test of major assumptions about behavior change: A comprehensive look at the effects of passive and active HIV-prevention interventions since the beginning of the epidemic. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 856897.

[6] Shuck, B., Rose, K. (2013) Reframing employee engagement within the context of meaning and purpose: Implications for HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 15, 341-355. Doi:10.1177/1523422313503235.

[7] Ahmad, T., Farrukh, F., & Nazir, S. (2015) Capacity building boost employees’ performance. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-05-2014-0036.


[8] Gruman, J. A., Saks, A. M. (2011) Performance management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 123-136.

[9] Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017) Self-Determination Theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. Advance online publication

[10] Bock, L. (2015) Work rules! Insights from inside Google that will transform how you live and lead. New York: Grand Central.

[11] Fowler, S. (2014) Why motivating people doesn’t work and what does: The new science of leading, energizing, and engaging. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

[12] Friedman, R. (2014) The best place to work: The art and science of creating an extraordinary workplace. New York: Penguin.

[13] Nnaeto J. & Ndoh J. (2018) Impact of Motivation on Employee Performance: A Study of Alvan Ikoku Federal College of Education, Journal of Management and Strategy, Vol. 9, No. 1; 2018. https://doi.org/10.5430/jms.v9n1p53.