A Head-to-Head Comparison of Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Post-PCI Patients: Implications of the SMART-CHOICE 3 Trial

Download Article

DOI: 10.21522/TIJAR.2014.12.02.Art021

Authors : Faraaz Zaveri, Saria Naser

Abstract:

The long-term antiplatelet strategy for patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) continues to evolve, particularly in high-risk individuals who complete the standard duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Traditionally, aspirin has been central to secondary prevention regimens. However, increasing concerns regarding its gastrointestinal toxicity, bleeding risk, and pharmacodynamic variability have prompted reevaluation of its role in monotherapy, especially in light of emerging evidence favoring P2Y12 inhibitors such as clopidogrel. The SMART-CHOICE 3 trial addressed this clinical uncertainty through a large-scale, multicenter, open-label randomized trial conducted across 26 sites in South Korea. A total of 5,506 patients with previous myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, or complex coronary lesions who had completed DAPT after PCI were randomized to receive either clopidogrel (75 mg/day) or aspirin (100 mg/day) monotherapy. Over a median follow-up of 2.3 years, the primary composite outcome—death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke—occurred significantly less frequently in the clopidogrel group (4.4%) compared to the aspirin group (6.6%) (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.54–0.93; p=0.013). Breaking down the composite, myocardial infarction was halved in the clopidogrel arm (1.0% vs. 2.2%; HR 0.54), and all-cause mortality was numerically lower (2.4% vs. 4.0%; HR 0.71). Stroke rates were similar between groups. Notably, there was no difference in major bleeding between the two strategies (both 3.0%; HR 0.97), dispelling prior concerns regarding clopidogrel’s bleeding risk. Clopidogrel also showed a favorable safety profile with no increase in adverse events. In conclusion, clopidogrel monotherapy provides a superior net clinical benefit compared to aspirin for long-term secondary prevention following PCI, especially in high-risk patients. Its targeted mechanism of action, lower bleeding liability, and consistent performance across major trials strongly support its preferential use over aspirin in modern antiplatelet therapy. These results validate recent shifts in international guidelines advocating personalized, risk-adjusted approaches to antiplatelet therapy.


References:

[1].      Antithrombotic Trialists' (ATT) Collaboration, Baigent, C., Blackwell, L., Collins, R., Emberson, J., Godwin, J., Peto, R., Buring, J., Hennekens, C., Kearney, P., Meade, T., Patrono, C., Roncaglioni, M. C., & Zanchetti, A., 2009, Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet (London, England), 373(9678), 1849–1860, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60503-1

[2].      Costa, F., Montalto, C., Branca, M., Hong, S. J., Watanabe, H., Franzone, A., Vranckx, P., Hahn, J. Y., Gwon, H. C., Feres, F., Jang, Y., De Luca, G., Kedhi, E., Cao, D., Steg, P. G., Bhatt, D. L., Stone, G. W., Micari, A., Windecker, S., Kimura, T., Valgimigli, M., 2023, Dual antiplatelet therapy duration after percutaneous coronary intervention in high bleeding risk: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. European Heart Journal, 44(11), 954–968, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac706

[3].      Levine, G. N., Bates, E. R., Bittl, J. A., Brindis, R. G., Fihn, S. D., Fleisher, L. A., Granger, C. B., Lange, R. A., Mack, M. J., Mauri, L., Mehran, R., Mukherjee, D., Newby, L. K., O'Gara, P. T., Sabatine, M. S., Smith, P. K., & Smith, S. C., Jr, 2016, 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation, 134(10), e123–e155, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000404

[4].      Capodanno, D., Bhatt, D. L., Gibson, C. M., James, S., Kimura, T., Mehran, R., Rao, S. V., Steg, P. G., Urban, P., Valgimigli, M., Windecker, S., & Angiolillo, D. J., 2022, Bleeding avoidance strategies in percutaneous coronary intervention. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 19(2), 117–132, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-021-00598-1

[5].      Capodanno, D., & Angiolillo, D. J., 2023, Long-Term P2Y12 Inhibitor or Aspirin as Single Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Previous Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circulation, 147(2), 118–121, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.063004

[6].      Vrints, C., Andreotti, F., Koskinas, K. C., Rossello, X., Adamo, M., Ainslie, J., Banning, A. P., Budaj, A., Buechel, R. R., Chiariello, G. A., Chieffo, A., Christodorescu, R. M., Deaton, C., Doenst, T., Jones, H. W., Kunadian, V., Mehilli, J., Milojevic, M., Piek, J. J., Pugliese, F., ESC Scientific Document Group, 2024, 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. European Heart Journal, 45(36), 3415–3537, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177

[7].      Park, T. K., Song, Y. B., Ahn, J., Carriere, K. C., Hahn, J. Y., Yang, J. H., Choi, S. H., Choi, J. H., Lee, S. H., & Gwon, H. C., 2016, Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin as an Antiplatelet Monotherapy After 12-Month Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy in the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 9(1), e002816, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002816

[8].      Park, H. W., Kang, M. G., Ahn, J. H., Bae, J. S., Tantry, U. S., Gurbel, P. A., & Jeong, Y. H., 2021, Effects of Monotherapy with Clopidogrel vs. Aspirin on Vascular Function and Hemostatic Measurements in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: The Prospective, Crossover I-LOVE-MONO Trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(12), 2720, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122720

[9].      Costa, F., Van Klaveren, D., Feres, F., James, S., Räber, L., Pilgrim, T., Hong, M. K., Kim, H. S., Colombo, A., Steg, P. G., Bhatt, D. L., Stone, G. W., Windecker, S., Steyerberg, E. W., Valgimigli, M., & PRECISE-DAPT Study Investigators, 2019, Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration Based on Ischemic and Bleeding Risks After Coronary Stenting. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 73(7), 741–754, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.048

[10].     Writing Committee Members, Lawton, J. S., Tamis-Holland, J. E., Bangalore, S., Bates, E. R., Beckie, T. M., Bischoff, J. M., Bittl, J. A., Cohen, M. G., DiMaio, J. M., Don, C. W., Fremes, S. E., Gaudino, M. F., Goldberger, Z. D., Grant, M. C., Jaswal, J. B., Kurlansky, P. A., Mehran, R., Metkus, T. S., Jr, Nnacheta, L. C.,  Zwischenberger, B. A., 2022, 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: Executive Summary. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 79(2), 197–215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.005

[11].     Gargiulo, G., Windecker, S., Vranckx, P., Gibson, C. M., Mehran, R., & Valgimigli, M., 2016, A Critical Appraisal of Aspirin in Secondary Prevention: Is Less More? Circulation, 134(23), 1881–1906, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023952

[12].     Collet, J. P., Thiele, H., Barbato, E., Barthélémy, O., Bauersachs, J., Bhatt, D. L., Dendale, P., Dorobantu, M., Edvardsen, T., Folliguet, T., Gale, C. P., Gilard, M., Jobs, A., Jüni, P., Lambrinou, E., Lewis, B. S., Mehilli, J., Meliga, E., Merkely, B., Mueller, C., ESC Scientific Document Group, 2021, 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. European Heart Journal, 42(14), 1289–1367, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575

[13].     Cattaneo, M., 2015, P2Y12 receptors: structure and function. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis: JTH, 13(Suppl 1), S10–S16, https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.12952

[14].     Choi, K. H., Park, Y. H., Lee, J. Y., Jeong, J. O., Kim, C. J., Yun, K. H., Lee, H. C., Chang, K., Park, M. W., Bae, J. W., Doh, J. H., Cho, B. R., Kim, H. Y., Kim, W., Kim, U., Rha, S. W., Hong, Y. J., Lee, H. J., Ahn, S. G., Kim, D. I., MART-CHOICE 3 investigators, 2025, Efficacy and safety of clopidogrel versus aspirin monotherapy in patients at high risk of subsequent cardiovascular event after percutaneous coronary intervention (SMART-CHOICE 3): a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial. Lancet (London, England), 405(10486), 1252–1263, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00449-0