Evaluating the Current Usage and Integration of ICTs in Education: A Review of Teachers’ Usage and Barriers to Integration

Download Article

DOI: 10.21522/TIJAR.2014.04.02.Art011

Authors : Caleb Moyo

Abstract:

This study examined current usage of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in a group of private secondary schools in Qatar and explored the barriers to effective integration of technology in Maths and Science lessons. The data was obtained from a total of 40 (18 female and 22 male) high school teachers. Results indicate that most teachers do not use ICTs as part of their pedagogical repertoire, instead, teachers reported using ICTs mostly for administrative work: - tracking attendance, preparing power point presentations, handouts and assessments. The article also reviews personal, institutional and technological factors that hinder teachers’ use of computer technology in teaching and learning processes: - teacher-level, school-level and system-level. These barriers include lack of teacher ICT skills; lack of teacher confidence; lack of pedagogical professional development and a streamlined and effective school policy on ICT; lack of suitable and adequate educational software; limited access to ICT infrastructure and a restrictive curricula, amongst other factors. Teachers also made insightful suggestions on how to ameliorate the current situation. Implications of this study will help the group management and administration in planning, implementation and evaluation of effective integration of ICTs in teaching and learning within the group of schools, efficient use of limited technology infrastructure and resources, and improvement of access to learning for the students.

Keywords: ICT adoption; integration; barriers; teaching and learning.

References:

   [1].  Baum, J. A. C., & Rowley, T. J. (Eds.). (2008). Advances in strategic management: Network strategy, vol. 25. Oxford: JAI/Elsevier

   [2].  Busch, T. (2011). Capabilities in, capabilities out: overcoming digital divides by promoting corporate citizenship and fair ICT. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(4), 339–353.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

   [3].  Castells, M. (2004). The network society: a cross-cultural perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

   [4].  Chen, W., & Wellman, B. (2004). The global digital divide—within and between countries. IT & Society, 1(7), 39–45.

   [5].  Cheney, K. E. (2007). Pillars of a Nation: child citizens and Ugandan development. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

   [6].  Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

   [7].  Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

   [8].  Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

   [9].  Evoh, C. J. (2007). Policy networks and the transformation of secondary education through ICTs in Africa: the prospects and challenges of the NEPAD e-schools initiative. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 3(1), 64–84.

[10].  Gholami, R., Higon, D. A., Hanafizadeh, P., & Emrouznejad, A. (2010). Is ICT the key to development? Journal of Global Information Management, 18(1), 66–83.

[11].  Hawkins, R. J. (2002). Ten lessons for ICT and education in the developing world. In G. Kirkman, P. Cornelius, J. Sachs, & K. Schwab (Eds.), the global information technology report 2001–2002: readiness for the networked world (pp. 38–43). New York: Oxford University Press.

[12].  Hite, J. M., Hite, S. J., Mugimu, C. B., & Nsubuga, Y. (2010). Strategic “Co-opetition”: Head teacher networking in Uganda’s secondary schools. In A. J. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 197–220). Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.

[13].  James, J. (2001). Low-cost computing and related ways of overcoming the global digital divide. Journal of Information Science, 27, 385.

[14].  James, J. (2011). Are changes in the digital divide consistent with global equality or inequality? The Information Society, 27(2), 121–128.

[15].  Jhurree, V. (2005). Technology integration in education in developing countries: guidelines to policy makers. International Education Journal, 6(4), 467–483.

[16].  Keniston, K. (2002). Grassroots ICT projects in India: some preliminary hypotheses. Information Technology in Developing Countries, 11(3), 60–64.

[17].  Kozma, R., McGhee, R., Quellmalz, E., & Zalles, D. (2004). Closing the digital divide: evaluation of the World Links program. International Journal of Educational Development, 24, 361–381.

[18].  Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

[19].  Richards, L. (2009). Handling qualitative data: a practical guide (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

[20].  UNESCO. (2010). EFA global monitoring report: reaching the marginalized. Paris: UNESCO.

[21].  Uzunbolyu, H., & Tuncay, N. (2010). Divergence of the digital world of teachers. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 186–194.