and handloom do not only represent an industry in India but also represent heart
and soul of India. It reflects the cultural richness and diversity of India and
also supports many families in earning their bread and butter. But Handloom is not
giving that push to the economy which ideally it should. As per data, around 13.93
million Indians were engaged in handicraft and handloom production in 2017 and it
is estimated to increase to 17.79 million in 2022. Ministry of Commerce has indicated
the production of the Indian Handicraft and Handloom sector as being INR 302.57
billion with INR 168.58 billion generated through export. Based on past trends a
growth of 16% is expected in 2017-22. But measures must be taken to increase this
growth and thereby increasing the income of the artisans.
industry in India has a significant contribution towards employment generation as
well as plays an important role in preserving the cultural identity (Liebl and Roy
2004). Despite measures by Government to protect the indigenous treasures, the economic
potential of most of the products has been underutilized. However, with the “Make
in India” campaign and Planning Commission giving it due place and priority we hope
that handloom sector regains its unique identity. GI (Geographical Indication) Tag
is one of the ways to protect the identity of our handloom product and to protect
our heritage. This research will discuss about ways and skills in which the traditional
Banarasi weavers can keep align with changing customer perceptions and thus enhance
their employment skills and also to bring about tangible rural transformation, by
enhancing employment skills and measures for preventing migration to other cities
and also preventing them to switch to other jobs as unskilled laborers.
sector, Brand Recognition, GI Tagging, Rural Development, Geographical Indication.
Geographical Indication Tags – Are GI Tags Helping in India’s Export, April
Note, 'Why do Geographical Indications Matter to Us?' 2004.
.Finger J M &
Schuler P (Eds.), Poor People's Knowledge: Promoting Intellectual Property in
Developing Countries, World Bank Publications (2004).
.Fowler B J,
preventing counterfeit craft designs, Poor People’s Knowledge: Promoting
Intellectual Property in Developing Countries, Washington DC: The World Bank,
Lesser, W.H. and Ye, C., 2011. ‘The economic effects of geographical
indications on developing country producers: a comparison of Darjeeling and
Oolong teas’, The WIPO Journal, 2(2):157–72.
Recognition and Marketing Opportunities of a Handloom Product: A Study in
Kuthampully, Doctoral Dissertation, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, 2016.
.Mérel, P. and
Sexton, R.J., 2012. ‘Will geographical indications supply excessive quality?’
European Review of Agricultural Economics, 39(4):567–87. (European Review of
Agricultural Economics Advance Access published November 29, 2011).
.Singh N, The
Importance of GI Tags: Why Bengal is Celebrating Its Rasogulla Victory, https://theprint.in/2017/11/15/why-bengal-is-celebrating-a-gi-tag-and-what-itmeans/
(accessed on 15 November 2017).
Property Organization/Geographical Indications, http://www.environmentallawsofindia.com/geographical-indications-of-goods.html.
and Chakrabarti, Case Studies on Industrial Cluster: A Study of Kanpur Leather
and Footwear, Varanasi Silk Saree and Moradabad Brassware Cluster, Department
of Scientific and Industrial Research, Government of India, Technical Report,