Abstract:

The main objective of the study was to find out the importance and benefits lecturers at technical university lecturers in Ghana derive from continuing professional development. The study was qualitative in nature, and a sample size of forty-eighty was chosen. The sample size was chosen from two technical universities. The sample comprised six deans of faculties, six heads of departments, and thirty-six lecturers. Two interview schedules were used for the data collection. One of the interview schedules was used to interview the deans and heads of departments, and the other was used to interview the lecturers. The study revealed that CPD plays an important role for lecturers as it helps them stay abreast with the happenings in their area of specialties. It, moreover, helps them to stay relevant to their students so that the students explore their latent qualities. CPD helps lecturers to gain self-confidence and self-actualization. It equips lecturers to qualify to apply for promotions and appointments. The more the lecturers embark on CPD, they learn the relevant skills to conduct research and come out with innovative results which are published in recognized journals. The benefit the lecturers enjoy is that it helps them to conduct and publish quality results which puts them in a better position to qualify and apply for promotions and appointments. The students benefit from CPD as it helps lecturers to acquire innovative and better teaching methods which make lectures interesting and understanding. It is recommended that all lecturers should make it a policy to attend at least one CPD program a year.

References:

[1] ALT (2015). Why is CPD important? Available at https://www.atl.org.uk/Images/worklife_campaign_cpd_factsheet.pdf (Accessed: 8 December 2026).

[2] Caena, F. (2011) Professional development of teachers: literature review quality in teachers’ continuing professional development. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/repository/education/policy/strategic-framework/doc/teacher-development_en.pdf (Accessed: 8 December 2021).

[3] Bolam, R., and D. Weindling. 2006. Synthesis of research and evaluation projects concerned with capacity-building through teachers’ professional development. General Teaching Council for England.

[4] Weiner, G. 2002. Professional Development, Teacher Education, Action research and Social Justice: a recent initiative in North Sweden, paper presented at the Annual Conference, In-service and Professional Development Association, Birmingham, 1-3 November 2002.

[5] Wilde, J. 2005. ‘Doing the undoable’. Professional development in schools in Special Measures. NCSL work in progress. Nottingham: National College of School Leadership.

[6] McLinden, M.T., McCall, D. H. and Weston, A. 2006. Developing online problem-based resources for the professional development of teachers of children with visual impairment. Open Learning 21, no. 3: 237–51.

[7] McNicholl, J., and Noone, M. 2007. Teaching and learning at A level within a modular context: A collaborative project with biology teachers. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, September 5–8, at the Institute of Education, University of London, UK.

[8] Pedder, D. 2006. Organizational conditions that foster successful classroom promotion of learning how to learn. Research Papers in Education 21, no. 2: 171–200.

[9] Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Evans. D. and Firth, A. (CPD Review Group). 2005. The impact of collaborative CPD on classroom teaching and learning. Review: What do teacher impact data tell us about collaborative CPD? London: EPPI-Centre.

[10] Bolam, R. and Weindling, D 2006. Synthesis of research and evaluation projects concerned with capacity-building through teachers’ professional development. General Teaching Council for England.

[11] Boyle, B., While, D. and Boyle, T. 2004. A longitudinal study of teacher change: What makes professional development effective? The Curriculum Journal 15, no. 1: 45–68.

[12] Dalgarno, N. and Colgan, L. 2007. Supporting novice elementary mathematics teachers’ induction in professional communities and providing innovative forms of pedagogical content knowledge development through information and communication technology. Teaching and Teacher Education 23, no. 7: 1051–65.

[13] Pedder, D., Opfer, V.D., McCormick, R. and Storey, A. 2010. ‘Schools and Continuing Professional Development in England – State of the Nation’ research study: Policy context, aims and design. The Curriculum Journal 21, no. 4: 365–94.

[14] Keay, J.K. 2006. Collaborative learning in physical education teachers’ early career professional development. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 11, no. 3: 285–305.

[15] Fox, A. 2006. A spatial dimension to networking in educational settings. A ‘Learning How to Learn’ project paper (unpublished).

[16] McGregor, J., Robinson, C and Fielding, M. 2006. Tracing the footprints of practice. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, September 6–9, at the University of Warwick, UK.

[17] Goodall, J., Day, C., Lindsay, G., Muijs, D. and Harris, A. 2006. Evaluating the impact of CPD. Available at: https://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/cedar/projects/completed05/contprofdev/cpdfinalreport05.pdf (Accessed: 8 December 2021).

[18] Wilkinson, D. 1998. University of Life? Police Review, 21 August, pp. 21–23.

[19] Jason, H. and Westberg, J. 1982. Teachers and Teaching in us Medical School, Chapters 19 and 20 (Connechcut), Appleton - Century – Groff.

[20] Jaafar, R. 2006. Faculty Development at School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia- An Overview, February 2006.