The main objective of the study was
to find out the importance and benefits lecturers at technical university lecturers
in Ghana derive from continuing professional development. The study was qualitative
in nature, and a sample size of forty-eighty was chosen. The sample size was chosen
from two technical universities. The sample comprised six deans of faculties, six
heads of departments, and thirty-six lecturers. Two interview schedules were used
for the data collection. One of the interview schedules was used to interview the
deans and heads of departments, and the other was used to interview the lecturers.
The study revealed that CPD plays an important role for lecturers as it helps them
stay abreast with the happenings in their area of specialties. It, moreover, helps
them to stay relevant to their students so that the students explore their latent
qualities. CPD helps lecturers to gain self-confidence and self-actualization. It
equips lecturers to qualify to apply for promotions and appointments. The more the
lecturers embark on CPD, they learn the relevant skills to conduct research and
come out with innovative results which are published in recognized journals. The
benefit the lecturers enjoy is that it helps them to conduct and publish quality
results which puts them in a better position to qualify and apply for promotions
and appointments. The students benefit from CPD as it helps lecturers to acquire
innovative and better teaching methods which make lectures interesting and understanding.
It is recommended that all lecturers should make it a policy to attend at least
one CPD program a year.
 ALT (2015).
Why is CPD important? Available at https://www.atl.org.uk/Images/worklife_campaign_cpd_factsheet.pdf
(Accessed: 8 December 2026).
 Caena, F.
(2011) Professional development of teachers: literature review quality in teachers’
continuing professional development. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/repository/education/policy/strategic-framework/doc/teacher-development_en.pdf
(Accessed: 8 December 2021).
 Bolam, R.,
and D. Weindling. 2006. Synthesis of research and evaluation projects concerned
with capacity-building through teachers’ professional development. General Teaching
Council for England.
G. 2002. Professional Development, Teacher Education, Action research and Social
Justice: a recent initiative in North Sweden, paper presented at the Annual Conference,
In-service and Professional Development Association, Birmingham, 1-3 November 2002.
 Wilde, J.
2005. ‘Doing the undoable’. Professional development in schools in Special Measures.
NCSL work in progress. Nottingham: National College of School Leadership.
M.T., McCall, D. H. and Weston, A. 2006. Developing online problem-based resources
for the professional development of teachers of children with visual impairment.
Open Learning 21, no. 3: 237–51.
J., and Noone, M. 2007. Teaching and learning at A level within a modular context:
A collaborative project with biology teachers. Paper presented at the British Educational
Research Association Annual Conference, September 5–8, at the Institute of Education,
University of London, UK.
D. 2006. Organizational conditions that foster successful classroom promotion of
learning how to learn. Research Papers in Education 21, no. 2: 171–200.
P., Bell, M., Evans. D. and Firth, A. (CPD Review Group). 2005. The impact of collaborative
CPD on classroom teaching and learning. Review: What do teacher impact data tell
us about collaborative CPD? London: EPPI-Centre.
 Bolam, R.
and Weindling, D 2006. Synthesis of research and evaluation projects concerned with
capacity-building through teachers’ professional development. General Teaching Council
 Boyle, B.,
While, D. and Boyle, T. 2004. A longitudinal study of teacher change: What makes
professional development eﬀective? The Curriculum Journal 15, no. 1: 45–68.
N. and Colgan, L. 2007. Supporting novice elementary mathematics teachers’ induction
in professional communities and providing innovative forms of pedagogical content
knowledge development through information and communication technology. Teaching
and Teacher Education 23, no. 7: 1051–65.
D., Opfer, V.D., McCormick, R. and Storey, A. 2010. ‘Schools and Continuing Professional
Development in England – State of the Nation’ research study: Policy context, aims
and design. The Curriculum Journal 21, no. 4: 365–94.
 Keay, J.K.
2006. Collaborative learning in physical education teachers’ early career professional
development. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 11, no. 3: 285–305.
 Fox, A.
2006. A spatial dimension to networking in educational settings. A ‘Learning How
to Learn’ project paper (unpublished).
J., Robinson, C and Fielding, M. 2006. Tracing the footprints of practice. Paper
presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference,
September 6–9, at the University of Warwick, UK.
J., Day, C., Lindsay, G., Muijs, D. and Harris, A. 2006. Evaluating the impact of
CPD. Available at: https://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/cedar/projects/completed05/contprofdev/cpdfinalreport05.pdf
(Accessed: 8 December 2021).
D. 1998. University of Life? Police Review, 21 August, pp. 21–23.
 Jason, H.
and Westberg, J. 1982. Teachers and Teaching in us Medical School, Chapters 19 and
20 (Connechcut), Appleton - Century – Groff.
R. 2006. Faculty Development at School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia-
An Overview, February 2006.