study was conducted using Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI) as the Case
study. A sound and effective budgeting system is based upon certain
prerequisites/or conditions. Failure to observe and appreciate these essentials
will render the budgeting exercise ineffective (Arora, 1995). It was against
this background that the study was aimed at examining the effectiveness of IDI
budget systems and its impact on the liquidity levels of the Institution.
respondents were selected using purposive and simple random sampling
techniques. Descriptive and Associational research designs were adopted with
Data gathered through Questionnaires and interview guides. The SPSS technique
was used to establish the relationship between Budgeting systems and liquidity
major findings from the research study indicated that the budgeting systems
used were inapt. It was also revealed that, there exists a positive relationship
between Budgeting systems and control and liquidity level. In this respect, it
was concluded that though many other factors were pointed out as possible
causes of the declining levels of liquidity in the Institution between 2010 and
2014, poor budget systems and budget control strategies were largely held
the persistent declining liquidity trend, a new approach of budgeting which
encourages improvement by eliminating inefficiencies and wasteful expenditure
should be adopted.
[1.] Arora, M. N (1995), Cost Accounting principles and
practice , Vikas Publishing House.
[2.] Amanya, J (1999), Determinants of an effective budgetary
process in selected public enterprises in Uganda.
[3.] Balunywa, W (1997), Business Management.
[4.] Biggs, C and Benjamin (1990), Management Accounting
Techniques, CIMA Publication.
[5.] Bellis, J (1991), Activity based cost management,
Management Accounting Hand book, CIMA.
[6.] Clive, Otley and Merchant (1995), Accounting for
Management Control. Chapman and Hall publishers.
[7.] Drury, C (1992), Management and Cost Accounting, Chapman
[8.] Fozzard, A (2001). The basic budgeting problem:
Approaches to resource allocation in the public sector and their implications for
pro-poor budgeting. Kampala: Centre for Aid and public expenditure.
[9.] Grace, C.E (1964), Management Controls, Mitchell and co.
[10.] Hay, L. E, and Engstron, J. H. (1987). Essentials of
Accounting for government and_non-profit making organizations, Home Wood: Irwin
[11.] Horngren, C. T (1993), Introduction to management
Accounting. Prentice Hall.
[12.] Jonsson, S (1982). "Budget behaviour in Local
government", Accounting organizations and society, 3(7)
[13.] Lyden, J. and Miller, E. G. (1982), Public budgeting -
Program planning and Implementation (4th ed). Prentice - Hall.
[14.] Miller, E. C (1996), Objectives and Standards: An
approach to planning and control, AMA. Research study 74.
[15.] Modern, J (1986), Zero based budgeting. Management Accounting.
[16.] Novik, D. (ed) (1973). Current practice in programme
budgeting (PPBS). New York: Crane Russak.
[17.] Otley, D (1976), Budgeting control and Managerial
[18.] Otley, D (1978), Budget use and managerial performance.
Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 16. No 1.
[19.] Pandey, I. M (1996), Management Accounting. Vikas
[20.] Stoner, J (1996), Management, Prentice Hall.
[21.] Suver, J and Brown (1977), Where does_zero based-
budgeting work? Harvard Business review, Nov/Dec.
[22.] Kakuru Julius (2000), Finance decisions and the
business, 1st Edition, kampala, Business publishing group.
[23.] Charles Tapiero (2004), Risk and Financial Management:
Mathematical and computational methods.
[24.] John Wiley (2004), Business Trends Quarterly and their
[25.] Conroy (2005), “Customer profitability, and treatment
of Acquisition spending”, Journal of Managerial Issues, 17 (1), 11 – 25