Abstract:

Chapter one has focused on giving background of the study, significance, research objectives and questions, and limitation of the study. Furthermore, this chapter has provided statement of the problem upon which the research study has been anchored.

References:

[1.] Allen, T. Harrell, (1978) New Methods in Social Science Research: Praeger Publishers, New York

[2.] Bailey, Kenneth D., (1978) “Methods of Social Research,” Ronald Press, New York,

[3.] Best, John W., and Kahn, James V. (1986), “Research in Education,” 5th Ed., Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi: India

[4.] Berg, B. L. (2007) Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, Pearson Education: Boston.

[5.] Binnendijk, A. (2000) Results-based Management in the Development Cooperation Agencies: A Review of Experience. Paper prepared for OECD/DAC Working Party on Aid Evaluation.

[6.] Booth, Wayne, Gregory G. Colomb and Joseph M. Williams (2008): The Craft of Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press

[7.] Coghlan, David and Teresa Brannick (2001): Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization. London: SAGE

[8.] Cochran, W. G. (1963) Sampling Techniques, 2nd Ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York

[9.] Crawford P & Bryce P. (2003): Project monitoring and evaluation: A method of enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of aid project implementation. International Journal of Project Management, 21(5): 363-373, Elsevier Science Ltd and IPMA.

[10.] Danida (2005): Evaluation. Capacity Development, Outcome Evaluation, Field-testing of the Methodology. Available at: http://startinternational.org/library/archive/files/danida-cd-evaluation-144_eab5be065b.pdf (accessed 18/05/2015).

[11.] Ebrahim, A. (2003) Accountability in practice: mechanisms for NGOs, World Development, Vol 31, No. 5, pp: 813-829, www.elsevier.com/locate.worlddev.

[12.] Edwards, M. and Hulme, D. (2000) Scaling up NGO impact on development: learning from experience, In Development, NGOs and civil society, Edited by D. Eade, Oxfam, Oxford, pp 44- 63.

[13.] Ebrahim, Alnoor and V. Kasturi Rangan (2010): The Limits of Nonprofit Impact: A Contingency Framework for Measuring Social Performance. Working paper, Available at: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/6439.html (accessed 23 May 2015)

[14.] Forss, K., Rebien, C. C. and, Carlsson, J (2002) Process Use of Evaluations: Type of Use that Precede Lessons Learned and Feedback, Evaluation, Vol. 8 (1): 29-45, Sage Publications: London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi.

[15.] Hailey and Sorgenfrei (2004) Measuring success: Issues in Performance Measurement, Occasional Papers Series No. 44, INTRAC

[16.] IFRC (2011b): Project/programme monitoring and evaluation (M & E) guide in NGOs programs. Geneva: IFRC

[17.] Kothari C.R, (2004) Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques 2^nd Ed. New Age International (P) Ltd., Publishers, New Delhi, India

[18.] Kusek, J.Z. and Rist, R. C. (2004) Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System, The World Bank: Washington DC.

[19.] McCoy L, Ngari P and Krumpe E. (2005): Building Monitoring, Evaluations and Reporting Systems for HIV/AIDS programmes. Washington DC. USAID

[20.] Mayne, John. (2007) Best Practices in Results-based Management: A Review of Experience. A Report for the United Nations Secretariat, Volume 1: Main Report. July.

[21.] Mayne, John (2007a); Challenges and lessonsin implementing Results‐based Management, Evaluation Vol. 13, 2007

[22.] Meier, W. (2003) Results-Based Management: Towards a Common Understanding among Development Cooperation Agencies, Discussion Paper prepared for CIDA and DAC Working Party on Aid Effectiveness.

[23.] NORAD (2008): Results Management in Norwegian Development Cooperation: A practical guide. Oslo: Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation NORAD)

[24.] NORAD (2013c): A Study of Monitoring and Evaluation in Six Norwegian Civil Society Organisations. Pdf Available at: http://www.norad.no/no/evaluering/publikasjoner/publikasjon?key=402245 (accessed 5 /05/2015)

[25.] Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Development Assistance Committee – DAC (2002) Glossary and key terms in Evaluation and Results-based Management, OECD

[26.] Poate, D. (2012) Measuring and Managing Results: Lessons for Development Cooperation, UNDP: New York.

[27.] PASSIA (2004): Civil Society empowerment: Monitoring and Evaluation.

[28.] www.passia.org/seminars/2002/monitoring.htm (Accessed on 18/5/2015

[29.] Taylor, D., and Balloch, S. (2005) The Politics of Evaluation, The Policy Press: Bristol.

[30.] UNDP (2007) Evaluation of Results Based Management at UNDP: Achieving Results, Evaluation Office, UNDP: New York http://www.undp.org/eo/documents/thematic/RBM/RBM_Evaluation.pdf (Accessed on 20/06/2015)

[31.] UNDP (2001) Managing for Results: Monitoring and Evaluation in UNDP. http://stone.undp.org/undpweb/eo/evalnet/docstore3/yellowbook/documents/FrameWORKfinal.pdf (Accessed on 20/06/2015)

[32.] UNDP (2002) Handbook on Monitoring and Evaluation for Results, Evaluation Office, UNDP: New York.

[33.] Uitto JA. (2004): Multi-country co-operation around shared waters: Role of Monitoring and Evaluation. Global environmental change, 14(1): 5-1429