It has been an old argument that Business
Corporation is a legal entity, separate entity and separate from the owner. It
has blanket to protect itself from being sued. Corporate veil has been used as
shield to protect itself from prosecution. With such protection, how can it be
morally responsible for its act? Moral responsibility is only applied to human,
not to any other things. However, this paper will argue otherwise. Based on
paper reviews, it is found that one of the requirements in determining moral
responsibility is the presence or the absence of knowledge and free will in a
certain act. Such requirement clearly strengthen the idea that corporation,
though it is a separate entity from the owner may not completely out of hand,
wash its hands and can just do what it wants but it has to be also guided by
moral standards and take moral responsibility to its immoral actions. The
reason is that a corporation as an entity is still composed of rational beings
that have knowledge and free will in pursuing their objectives. Therefore, when
things go wrong in the corporation, it is not only individual employees who
committed the crime are taking the moral blame but also the corporation as a
whole including the owner.
Amstrong, Walter Sinnott. 2011. Consequentialism.
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism/Retrieved, December, 23,
Arneson, J. Richard. 1998. What, if, Anything, Renders All Humans Morally
Equal. Oxford: Blackwell.
Articulo, C. Archimedes. 2005. Moral Philosophy. Andson Printing Corporation:
Athanassoulis, Nafsika. 2013. Virtue Ethics. Keele University: United Kingdom.
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/virtue/ Retrieved,
December 5, 2014.
Bentham, Jeremy, 1789. . An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and
Legislation., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907.
Jeremy.1776. “A Fragment on Government”http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism/Retrieved,
December 23, 2014.
Braithwaite, John & Fisse, Brent. 1998.
The Allocation of Responsibility for Corporate Crime: Individualism,
Collectivism and Accountability. University of Sidney Law Review. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/SydLRev/1988/3.pdf.
Assessed March 15, 2015.
E. 1980.Philosophy of
Responsibility. American Business Law Journal: Law School of
University of California: Davis
Fritz, Joanne. 2015. Four Uniques
Characteristics of Nonprofit Organizations. Nonprofit Charitable Organization:http://nonprofit.about.com/od/gettingstarted/a/What-Are-The-Key-Characteristics-Of-A-Nonprofit-Corporation.htm?utm_term=Nonprofit%20corporation&utm_content=p1-main-1-title&utm_medium=sem-sub&utm_source=google&utm_campaign=adid-sitelink-test-0000-0000-000000000000-1-ab-gse_ocode-22887&ad=semD&an=google_s&am=exact&q=Nonprofit%20corporation&dqi=&o=22887&l=dir&qsrc=1&askid=sitelink-test-0000-0000-000000000000-1-ab-gse. Retrieved, March 10, 2015.
Friedman, W. 1967. Legal Theory 656-69
(5thed.). Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. http://www.criminallawjournal.com.
Retrieved, March 5, 2015.
[11.] French, A. Peter. 1979. Corporate Moral
Agency, in Tom L. Beuchamp and Norman Bowie, eds. 1979. Ethical Theory and
Business. NJ: Prentice Hall.
[12.] Glenn, J. Paul. 1965. Ethics, A Lass Manual
in Moral Philosophy. London: B.Herder Book Co. Reprinted by National Bookstore:
Harris, C.E. 1986. Applying Moral Theories. Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Lederman, E. 1985. "Criminal Law, Perpetrator and Corporation: Rethinking
a Complex Triangle". Journal of Criminal Law &Criminology
Retrieved, March 20, 2015
Kant, Immanuel. 1790. The Science of Right, translated by
Hastie, W and Blunden, Andy. 2003. http://marxists.org/reference/subject/ethics/kant/morals/ch04.htm.retrieved,
December 2, 2014.
Matt. 2014. Immanuel Kant: Metaphysics. University of California. Internet
Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/kantmeta/#SH8c. Retrieved,
December 20, 2014
Mill, John Stuart. 1861 .Utilitarianism, Roger Crisp (ed.), Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1998.
Murray, Jean. 2015. Corporate Shield-Corporate
Veil-Piercing the Corporate Veil. US Business Law: Tax Categories. http://biztaxlaw.about.com/od/glossaryc/g/corpshield.htm. Retrieved, March 30, 2015
Murray, Jean. 2015. What is A Business
Partnership? US Business Law: Tax Categories. http://biztaxlaw.about.com/od/glossaryp/g/partnership.htm. retrieved, February, 2015.
Nozick, Robbert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Book, Inc: New York
Perez, William. 2015. Type of Business
Organizations: An Overview. Tax Planning: US Categories. http://taxes.about.com/od/taxplanning/a/incorporating_2.htm?utm_term=Kinds%20of%20Business%20Organization&utm_content=p1-main-1-title&utm_medium=sem-rel&utm_source=google&utm_campaign=adid-sitelink-test-0000-0000-000000000000-1-ab-gse_ocode-22887&ad=semD&an=google_s&am=exact&q=Kinds%20of%20Business%20Organization&dqi=&o=22887&l=dir&qsrc=6&askid=sitelink-test-0000-0000-000000000000-1-ab-gse. Retrieved, March 5, 2015
Sandel, Michael. 2014. Your Mind, Your
Retrieved, December 20, 2014.
[23.] Shaw, William. 1999. Business Ethics. Wadsworth Publishing Company,
International Thomson Publishing Company: Boston
C. 2003. Corporate Versus Moral Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 46:
143-150. Kluwer Academic Publishers
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.2004. Immanuel
Kant’s Moral Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/ Retrieved, October 28, 2014.
[26.] Velasquez, G. Manuel. 1998. Business Ethics:
Concepts and Cases. Singapore: Prentice Hall.
[27.] David T.
Risser. 2014. Collective Moral Responsibility. Penn State University
Harrisburg: USA. http://www.iep.utm.edu/collecti/. Retrieved, March 24, 2015
Philosophy. Prentice-Hall International Inc: Singapore
1996. Why Ethics Matters: A Defense of Ethics in Organization. Business
Ethics Quarterly, Volume 6, Issue 2. ISSN 1052-150X. 0201-0222.
David and Mckenna, Michael. 2006. Moral Responsibility and Alternative
Possibilities. Ashage Publishing Limited: England.