Quantifying Perception of Water Governance in Lethem Guyana Implications for Improved Water Services in the Community
Abstract:
This study examines community perceptions of water governance in Lethem, Guyana, with a focus on equity, access, and stakeholder inclusion. Using a survey of 377 residents, the research reveals generally positive views on fairness and collaboration but also highlights concerns about gender equity and the prioritization of vulnerable groups. The findings emphasize the importance of transparent, participatory, and culturally responsive governance systems. They also underscore the need to strengthen institutional mechanisms and visibility of inclusive policies to build public trust and improve water governance outcomes in hinterland communities. Policy implications are discussed for more effective, inclusive water resource management.
References:
[1]. Akhmouch, A., & Correia, F. N., 2016. The 12 OECD principles on water governance: When science meets policy. Utilities Policy, 43, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.06.004m
[2]. Bakker, K., & Morinville, C., 2013. The governance dimensions of water security: A review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 371(2002), 20130116. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2013.0116
[3]. Boelens, R., Hoogesteger, J., Swyngedouw, E., Vos, J., & Wester, P., 2016. Hydrosocial territories: A political ecology perspective. Water International, 41(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1134898
[4]. Carlisle, K., & Gruby, R. L., 2019. Polycentric systems of governance: A theoretical model for the commons. Policy Studies Journal, 47(4), 927–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12212
[5]. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D., 2018. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
[6]. Faguet, J. P., 2014. Decentralization and governance in water management: Evidence from Africa. Development Policy Review, 32(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.002
[7]. Global Water Partnership (GWP)., 2000. Integrated Water Resources Management. TAC Background Paper No. 4. Stockholm, Sweden. https://www.gwp.org
[8]. Guyana Bureau of Statistics. 2012. Population and Housing Census: Region 9 - Upper Takutu-Upper Essequibo. Retrieved from https://statisticsguyana.gov.gy/
[9]. Huitema, D., & Meijerink, S., 2017. The politics of river basin organizations: Institutional design choices, coalitions, and consequences. Ecology and Society, 22, 42. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09409-220242
[10]. Jarvis, W. T., Giordano, M., & Wolf, A. T., 2016. Assessing transboundary water governance. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 32(5), 681–695.
[11]. Mehta, L., Allouche, J., Nicol, A., & Walnycki, A., 2019. New water governance: Critiques and challenges. World Development, 120, 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104588
[12]. Mehta, L., Derman, B., & Manzungu, E., 2017. Flows and practices: The politics of integrated water resources management in Eastern and Southern Africa. Routledge.
[13]. Mollinga, P. P., 2010. Boundary work and the complexity of natural resources management. Crop Science, 50(Supplement 1), S-1–S-9. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.10.0570
[14]. Mukherji, A., Scott, C., Molden, D., & Maharjan, A., 2018. Megatrends in Hindu Kush Himalaya: Climate change, urbanisation and migration and their implications for water, energy and food. In A. Biswas, C., Tortajada, & P., Rohner (Eds.), Assessing Global Water Megatrends Water Resources Development and Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6695-5_8
[15]. OECD. 2015. Water Governance in OECD Countries: A Multi-Level Approach. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/water
[16]. Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.
[17]. Pahl-Wostl, C., Holtz, G., Kastens, B., & Knieper, C., 2010. Analyzing complex water governance regimes: The management and transition framework. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(7), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.08.006
[18]. Reed, M. S., Vella, S., Challies, E., de Vente, J., Frewer, L., Hohenwallner-Ries, D., Huber, T., Neumann, R. K., Oughton, E. A., Sidoli del Ceno, J., & van Delden, H., 2018. A theory of participation: What makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Restoration Ecology, 26(S1), S7–S17. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12541
[19]. Ribot, J. C., Agrawal, A., & Larson, A. M., 2006. Recentralizing while decentralizing: How national governments reappropriate forest resources. World Development, 34(11), 1864–1886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.001
[20]. Thiel, A., Mukhtarov, F., & Zikos, D., 2019. Governing beyond markets and states: Polycentric water governance. Water Alternatives, 12(2), 1–20. http://www.water-alternatives.org
[21]. Williams, M., Wiggins, R., Vogt, W. P., & Vogt, P. R., 2022. Beginning Quantitative Research. SAGE Publications.