The Impact of Leadership Styles on Employees’ Performance in Public and Private Organisations in Guyana

Download Article

DOI: 10.21522/TIJMG.2015.12.01.Art016

Authors : Eondrene Thompson

Abstract:

This article seeks to evaluate leadership styles—transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire—across the manufacturing and service sectors and at different organizational levels—senior management, middle management (supervisor), and junior level—to understand how these styles affect employees’ performance in public and private organizations in Guyana. Many studies have been conducted on leadership; however, there is a gap regarding the most appropriate leadership style for organisations to adopt to positively impact employees’ performance and contribute to the sustainable growth and development of the organisation. Moreover, a comparison between private and public organisations revealed that private organisations consistently outperform public organisations, as shown in parliamentary reports on public agencies and the published financial reports of privately owned organisations. The leadership styles examined by this study are hoped to bring clarity and set the stage for future studies.

References:

[1].   Anderson, J. A., 2010, Public Managers: How Public and Private Managers Differ in Leadership Behaviour. Public Administration Review. January/February 2010.

[2].   Avolio, B. J., 1999, Full Leadership Development: Building the vital Forces in Organizations. Sage Publications.

[3].   Bass, B. M., 1985, Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press.

[4].   Bhandari, P., 2023, Correlation Research| When and How to Use. Open Journal of Accounting, https://www.scirp.org>reference>referencepapers.

[5].   Blumberg, B. C., 2014, Business Research Methods. McGraw-Hill Education.

[6].   Creswell, J. W., 2014, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods (4th Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

[7].   Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E., 1955, Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 281–302.

[8].   David, E., 2024, Advantages of Using Questionnaires. WWW.profssurey.com/blog/advantagesdisadvantages-of-questionnaires/

[9].   Goolsarran, G. (n.d.). Organisational leadership in Guyana: International Journal of Business and Management.

[10].  Husband, G., (n.d.). Ethical Data Collection and Recognising the Impact of Semi-structured Interviews on Research Respondents. Education Sciences, 10(8), p206.

[11].  Kumar, M. T., 2013, Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press.

[12].  Lakens, D., 2022, Sample Size Justification. Research Gate.

[13].  O'Leary, Z., 2017, The Essential Guide to Your Research Project. Sage.

[14].  Salazar-Xirinachs, J. M., 2025, ‘Economic Survey of Latin America and the Caribbean 2025,’. United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.

[15].  Saunders, K. N., 2023, Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson.

[16].  Snelson, C. L., 2016, Qualitative and Mixed Methods Social Media Research – DOAJ. Open Access Journal.

[17].  Watkins, D. G., 2015, Mixed Methods Research. Oxford University Press.

[18].  West, M. A., 6. 1996, Innovation in Top Management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 680–693.

[19].  Zikmund, G. W., 2010, Business Research Methods. South Western Cengage Learning.

[20].  Romani, B., How to Write Results Section. Scientific Editing. https://www.scientific-editing info/blog/hw-to-write-the-results-section/