A Cross Sectional Survey of Nurses’ Responses to Vital Sign Values in a University Teaching Hospital

Download Article

DOI: 10.21522/TIJMD.2013.07.01.Art005

Authors : Akanbi, Olusola Olateju, Olakulehin, Olawale Adebayo, Onilede, David Adekunle, Adeoti, Moses Layiwola, Akinloye Tayewo Adebisi, Olanipekun Olusegun Olaolu

Abstract:

Background: Studies have shown that there were documented evidences of abnormal vital signs, without appropriate clinicians and nurses responses. We thus investigate the knowledge, and how nurses intend to respond to different combinations of vital signs values.

Methods: This study was carried out in Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Teaching Hospital Ogbomoso. Questionnaires were sent out to nurses to obtain relevant data regarding interpretation of vital sign values.

Results: Eighty questionnaires were analysed. The mean age of the respondents was 36.4 (±5.27) years. Nineteen (23.75%) respondents got correctly the normal range for all the vital signs and oxygen saturation. Seven (8.75%) respondents knew that pulse rate is the earliest vital sign to change in most deteriorating patients. Fifty-nine (73.75%) respondents considered oxygen saturation as reliable indicator of respiratory functions. Most respondents (78.73%) would not consider oxygen support until saturation fall below 90%. Seventy-five (93.75%) respondents could not identify correctly patients at risk of deterioration based on different combinations of set of vital sign values, SpO2 and level of consciousness. Sixty-seven (83.75%) rated themselves to have good to excellent knowledge on vital signs and its interpretation, however, only 9 (11.25%) respondents have good comprehensive knowledge on interpretation of vital signs.

Conclusion: Majority of the respondents could not interpret vital sign values correctly. We suggest need for continuous nursing education to bridge this gap.

Keywords: Vital signs, interpretation, nurses, and responses.


References:

[1].     Chua WL, Liaw SY, Mackey S et al. Front-line nurses’ experiences with deteriorating ward patients: a qualitative study. Int Nurs Rev 2013; 60:501-9.

[2].     Cretikos MA, Bellomo R, Hillman K et al. Respiratory rate: the neglected vital sign. Med J Aust. 2008; 188:657-9.

[3].     Fagan K, Sable A, Mehler PS et al. Vital sign abnormalities, rapid response, and adverse outcomes in hospital patients. Am J Med Qual. 2012; 27:480-486.

[4].     Goldhill DR. The critically ill: following your MEWS. Quarterly Journal of Medicine. 2001; 94: 507-10.

[5].     Goldhill DR, McNarry AF. Physiological abnormalities in early warning scores are related to mortality in adult inpatients. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92: 882-884.

[6].     Hands C, Reid E, Meredith P et al. The prevalence of recording of the signs of critical conditions and emergency responses in hospital wards- the SOCCER study. Resuscitation. 2005; 65:149-157.

[7].     Hillman KM et al. Antecedents to hospital deaths. Internal Medicine Journal. 2009; 31:6,343-348.

[8].     Hodget TJ, Kenward G, Vlachonikolis IG et al. The identification of risk factors for cardiac arrest and formulation of activation criteria to alert a medical emergency team. Resuscitation. 2002; 54:125-31.

[9].     ISQua Wenqi Mok, Wenru Wang, Simon Cooper, Emily Neo Kim Ang and Sok Ying Liaw. Attitudes towards vital signs monitoring in the detection of clinical deterioration: scale development and survey of ward nurses. International journal for Quality in Health Care. 2015;27(3):207-213.

[10]. Lee A, Bishop G, Hillman KM, Daffurn K. The Medical Emergency Team. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 1995; 23:183-6.

[11]. Ludikhuize J, Smorenburg SM, de Rooij SE, de Jonge E. Identification of deteriorating patients on general wards; measurement of vital parameters and potential effectiveness of the Modified Early Warning Score 2012 [updated Aug; cited 27 4]. 2012/02/22: [424 e7–13].

[12]. McGloin H, Adams SK, Singer M. Unexpected deaths and referral to intensive care of patients on general wards: are some potentially avoidable? J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1999; 33:255-9.

[13]. Olusola O. Akanbi, David A. Onilede, Moses L. Adeoti1, Olawale A. Olakulehin, Najeem A. Idowu and Olusegun O. Olanipekun. Improving Clinicians’ and Nurses’ Response to Abnormal Vital Signs in Hospital: The Roles of Modified Early Warning Scoring System and Rapid Response System. British Journal of Medicine & Medical Research 2017; 21(6): 1-11,

[14]. Rose L, Clarke SP, Vital signs. AJN. 2010; 110:11.

[15]. Royal College of Physicians. National Early Warning Score (NEWS): Standardising the assessment of acute-illness severity in the NHS. Report of a working party. London: RCP, 2012

[16]. Sax FL, Charlson ME. Medical patients at high risk for catastrophic deterioration. Critical Care Medicine. 1994;22: 244-7.

[17]. Society of Critical Care Medicine. Recognition and Assessment of the Seriously Ill Patient. In Fundamental Critical Care Support. 4th edition. Society of Critical Care Medicine. 2007. Pg 1-10.

[18]. Soong JTY, Soni N. Circulatory shock. Mrdicine 2013; 41:64-69.

[19]. Van LCH, Mitchell I. Missed opportunities. An observational study of vital signs measurement. Crit-care Resusc. 2008; 10:111-115.