Exploring the perception of women attending Nyagatare Health District, in Rwanda on abortion as one of family planning methods
This paper is focusing on abortion issue in Rwanda particularly the view
of population living in Nyagatare District to the abortion. In this study, a
quantitative descriptive design with a positivist paradigm guided the whole
research process. Two levels of sampling were done. The first was random
sampling for the selection of healthcare centres where five healthcare centres
were selected out of a total of eighteen. The second level was probability
sampling with a systematic strategy, which was used to select the participants
at healthcare centres. A total of 137 women volunteered to participate in the
study and completed an anonymous questionnaire. The authorisation to carry out
the research was obtained from Nyagatare District and five healthcare centres.
The research was approved by the University of KwaZulu-Natal Ethics Committee.
The gathered data were analysed using SPSS version 19. Among participants 12.4% wish to use abortion as family planning
method. The views on abortion remain different among people.
Keywords: Family planning, Abortion, spacing of births, abortion
and family planning
[1.] ABBOTT, P. &
RWIRAHIRA, J. 2010. Millennium Development Goals: Rwanda Country Report 2010. Kigali:
[2.] ALASUUTARI, P.,
BICKMAN, L. & BRANNEN, J. (Eds.). 2008. Social
research methods. London: Sage.
[3.] BASINGA, P.,
MOORE, A., SINGH, S., AUDAM, S., CARLIN, L., BIRUNGI, F. & NGABO, F.
(N.d.). Abortion incidence in Rwanda.
Available from: http://paa2011.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=110387 [29 April 2011].
[4.] BRINK, H. 2006. Fundamentals of research methodology for
healthcare professionals. Second edition. Cape Town: Juta.
[5.] BRISTOW, J.
2010. Abortion provision: Building on the gain. Abortion Review, 33:1-8.
[6.] BURNS, N. &
GROVE, S.K. 2005. The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique, and
utilization. Fifth edition. St
Louis: Elsevier: Saunders.
LIFE COALITION, 2009. Canadian Abortion
[8.] CASEY, S.E.,
MITCHELL, K.T., AMISI, I.M., HALIZA, M.M., AVELEDI, B., KALENGA, P. &
AUSTIN, J. 2009. Use of facility assessment data to improve reproductive health
service delivery in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Conflict and Health, 3:1–12.
[9.] CONSIDINE, J.,
BOTTI, M. & THOMAS, S. 2005. Design, format, validity and reliability of
multiple choice questions for use in nursing research and education. Collegian, 12(1):19–24.
(DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY AND DECENTRALIZATION PROJECT / MINISTÈRE DE
L’ADMINISTRATION LOCALE, DE LA BONNE GOUVERNANCE, DU DÉVELOPPEMENT
COMMUNAUTAIRE ET DES AFFAIRES SOCIALS). 2007. Nyagatare District Development Plan 2008–2012. Nyagatare.
[11.] DE MORA R.
Maternal Deaths from Unsafe Abortion in Uruguay. Accessed at: http://www.unfpa.org/news/eliminating-maternal-deaths-unsafe-abortion-uruguay
[12.] DO, W.D.R.
2009. The RAPID Model. Health Policy, Available from http://www.healthpolicyinitiative.com/index.cfm?id=software&get=Spectrum [19 February 2011].
[13.] DORENBOS, P.B.
& VAN VUUREN, A. 2003. Abolition of
abortion. Hilversum, Holland: Cry for Life International.
[14.] FORD, N.,
MILLS, E.J., ZACHARIAH, R. & UPSHUR, R. 2009. Ethics for conducting
research in conflict settings. Conflicts
and Health, 3(7):1–9.
[15.] FUREDI, A.
(n.d). The causes of unplanned pregnancy. Accessed on
[16.] GERHARDT, L.P.
2004. Research methodology explained for
everyday people. http://dc435.4shared.com/doc/AT_yhLqd/preview.html [11 April 2011].
N. 2008. Researching social life.
Third edition. Guildford: Sage.
[18.] GOLAFSHANI, N.
2003. Understanding validity and reliability in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4):597–607.
[19.] GRIGGS, C. 2009. As family
planning goes global, Haiti becomes a case in point. Available from: http://www.thecuttingedgenews.com/index.php?article=11553&pageid=&pagename [26 May 2011].
[20.] HARALAMBOS, M.
& HOLBORN, M. 2000. Sociology: Themes
and perspectives. Hammersmith: HarperCollins.
J.N., MILL, J., SPIERS, J., KULIG, J. & KIPP, W. 2010. Culture, context and
community: Ethical consideration for global nursing research. International Nursing Review, 57:70–77.
[22.] HUMAN RIGHTS.
N.d. Abortion and human right:
Declaration of right of the child. Available from: http://www.qrtl.org.au/humanrights.htm [9 May 2011].
[23.] JONES, S. 2008.
Fertility and population: Interview with John Guillebaud. South African
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,
[24.] KAHL, L. 2011. What is convenience sampling? Available
from: http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-convenience-sampling.htm [2 May 2011].
[25.] KEELE, R. 2011.
Nursing research and evidence-based
practice: Ten steps to success. Available from:
http://books.google.co.za/books?id=0g-f3YzPNU0C&pg=PA62&dq=Population+by+Burns+and+Grove+2010+(Nursing+Research)+book&hl=en&ei=MEq8TZaCBILB8QPO-vnKBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CEYQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false [30 April 2011].
[26.] KUMAR, R. 2005.
Research methodology: A step-by-step
guide for beginners. Second edition. Available from:
http://books.google.co.za/books?id=x_kp__WmFzoC&pg=PA158&lpg=PA158&dq=internal+consistency+(research+methodology)&source=bl&ots=mQl7A_de-c&sig=4lLRS2aRZFAv4C_Fyj3PFzkiTc4&hl=en&ei=kXi-TYPFG8nNswa9u8j8BQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CHAQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q&f=false [2 May 2011].
[27.] MATVEEV, A.V.
2002. The advantages of employing quantitative and qualitative methods in
intercultural research: Practical implications from the study of the
perceptions of intercultural communication competence by American and Russian
managers. Bulletin of Russian Communication, 168(1):59–67.
[28.] MOULE, P. &
GOODMAN, M. 2009. Nursing research: An introduction. London: Sage.
[29.] MUTESI, T.
2011. 2 arrested for abortion. ORINFOR.
23 April. Available from:
http://www.orinfor.gov.rw/printmedia/topstory.php?id=2761 [29 April 2011].
[30.] NAMBI, V.I.
(Ed.). 2009. Abortion still a challenge to reproductive health. The New Times. Available from: http://allafrica.com/stories/200906240198.html [29 April 2011].
G. (Ed.). 2009. Legalise abortion, members of parliaments demand. The New Times. Available from: http://allafrica.com/stories/200907310051.html [29 April 2011].
[32.] POLIT, D.F.
& BECK, C.T. 2008. Nursing research: Generating and assessing
evidence for nursing practice.
Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins.
[33.] STACEY, D.
2008. Natural contraceptive methods:
Natural family planning options. Available from: http://contraception.about.com/od/naturalmethods/tp/behavioral.htm [8 April 2011].
[34.] THAXTON, M.
2007. Integrating population, health, and
environment in Kenya. Available from: http://www.prb.org/pdf07/phe-kenya.pdf[29 December 2008].
[35.] TSUI, A.O.,
MCDONALD-MOSLEY, R. & BURKE, A.E. 2010. Family planning and the burden of
unintended pregnancies. Epidemiologic Reviews, 32(1):152-174.
[36.] TWYCROSS, A.
& SHIELDS, L. 2004. Validity and reliability – what’s it all about? Part 1:
Validity in quantitative studies. Paediatric
[37.] UNDIE, C.C. & RAMARAO, S. 2010. Community mobilization for post abortion
care in Kenya: Baseline evaluation report. The RESPOND Project Study
Series: Contributions to global knowledge, report no. 2. New York: Engender
Health/The RESPOND Project.
[38.] WEAVER, K.
& OLSON, J.K. 2006. Understanding paradigms used for nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing,