Abstract:

This article interrogates the contextual relevance and application of evaluation steering in a strategy implementation discourse by local NGOs in Uganda. The study hinges on the assumption that evaluation outputs from local NGOs are often less utilized due to inept leadership, yet critical programmatic and policy issues of strategic relevance can best be utilized through a steering score. The study’s main purpose was to examine the relationship between evaluation steering and the strategy performance of local NGOs. The study drew findings from a cross-sectional study conducted using quantitative methods. In total, 349 participants comprising of field workers, mid-level staff, and executives from local NGOs from all parts of Uganda, were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Results of the study showed that there was a positive correlation between evaluation steering and strategy performance constructs of fund stability (r = .243**), community satisfaction (r = .201**), and timeliness (r=.134**). The study concludes that evaluation steering has a high potential to improve fund stability, community satisfaction, and timeliness despite a weaker level of positive correlations. The national NGO bureau and NGO associations should establish executive capacity-building initiatives to support local NGOs to overcome the weakness in the current evaluation steering process. Consultants, volunteers, and NGO forums should advocate for donor resources to deepen organizational development, which supports an effective steering process.

References:

[1] Roepstorff, K. (2020). A call for critical reflection on the localization agenda in humanitarian action. Third World Quarterly, 41(2), 284-301.

[2] Gangrade K.D., (1997) Integrated Approach to Rural Development with Social Justice, Delhi; National service scheme unit, Delhi School of Social Work,1997.

[3] Williams, G. (2003). Studying development and explaining policies. Oxford development studies, 31(1), 37-58.

[4] Drury, D. H. (1984). An evaluation of data processing steering committees. MIS Quarterly, 257-265.

[5] Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., & Parker, A. (2002). Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California management review, 44(2), 25-46.

[6] Obiwuru, T. C., Okwu, A. T., Akpa, V. O., & Nwankwere, I. A. (2011). Effects of leadership style on organizational performance: A survey of selected small-scale enterprises in Ikosi-Ketu council development area of Lagos State, Nigeria. Australian Journal of business and management research, 1(7), 100.

[7] Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus. Sage.

[8] Stufflebeam, D. (2001). Evaluation models. New directions for evaluation, 2001(89), 7-98.

[9] Holma, K., Kontinen, T., & Blanken-Webb, J. (2018). Growth into citizenship: Framework for conceptualizing learning in NGO interventions in sub-Saharan Africa. Adult Education Quarterly, 68(3), 215-234.

[10] Smith, A. D. M. (1994). Management strategy evaluation: the light on the hill. Population dynamics for fisheries management, 249-253.

[11] Howes, C., & Matheson, C. C. (1992). Sequences in the development of competent play with peers: Social and social pretend play. Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 961.

[12] Hailey, D. J., & Sorgenfrei, M. (2004). Measuring success: Issues in performance measurement. Oxford: INTRAC.

[13] Wadongo, B. I. (2014). Performance management and evaluation in non-profit organizations: an embedded mixed methods approach.

[14] Bougheas, S., Isopi, A., & Owens, T. (2012). How do donors allocate funds to NGOs? Evidence from Uganda (No. 12/08). CREDIT research paper.

[15] Saunders, M., & Sin, C. (2015). Middle managers’ experience of policy implementation and mediation in the context of the Scottish quality enhancement framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 135-150.

[16] Paul, A. K., & Anantharaman, R. N. (2003). Impact of people management practices on organizational performance: analysis of a causal model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(7), 1246-1266.

[17] Rights, L. (2013). Evaluation Of Grassroots Community–Based Legal Aid Activities in Uganda and Tanzania.

[18] Orem, J. N., Marchal, B., Mafigiri, D., Ssengooba, F., Macq, J., Da Silveira, V. C., & Criel, B. (2013). Perspectives on the role of stakeholders in knowledge translation in health policy development in Uganda. BMC health services research, 13(1), 1-13.

[19] Kayrooz, C., & Trevitt, C. (2005). Research in organisations and communities: Tales from the real world. Allen & Unwin.

[20] Young, J. O. (2001). A defence of the coherence theory of truth. Journal of philosophical research, 26, 89-101.

[21] Kelly, L. (2019). Legislation on non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Ethiopia, Rwanda, and England and Wales.

[22] Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design.

[23] Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (1999). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Acts Press.

[24] Uganda National NGO Forum (2021). The NGO blueprint. Strategic Plan 2021-2025. Accessed from https://ngoforum.or.ug/sites/default/files/publications/THE%20NGO%20BLUEPRINT%20-%20UNNGOF%20STRATEGIC%20PLAN%202021%20-2025.pdf.

[25] MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological methods, 4(1), 84.

[26] Ahlström, L. H., Eskilsson, C. S., & Björklund, E. (2005). Determination of banned azo dyes in consumer goods. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 24(1), 49-56.