Retained Foreign Body, Still a Reality and Consequence of Non-use of the WHO Surgical Safety Check Lists in Tropical Surgery

Download Article

DOI: 10.21522/TIJPH.2013.11.01.Art003

Authors : Leku BA, Mokake DM, Verla VS, Ngunde PJ, Elong FA, Ngowe NM

Abstract:

Adhesions are a major cause of acute abdomen in previously operated patients. The presence of a retained foreign body in the abdomen is a leading factor in the development of post-operative adhesion. It is, therefore important to take all necessary measures to avoid retained foreign bodies in the abdomen, as this increases the risk of developing post-operative adhesions and complications. A 32yr old female with a relevant past surgical history of an emergency laparotomy indicated for a ruptured ectopic pregnancy presented as an emergency 3 months after the above surgery at a tropical regional hospital with signs of generalized peritonism, following a brief history of sudden onset of lower abdominal pains. A diagnosis of bowel obstruction was made. Resuscitation was done, followed by an emergency exploratory laparotomy. It revealed the presence of a retained foreign body (gauze in our case), surrounded by multiple adhesion around the ileo-cecal junction with 2 meters of ischemic small bowel. Adhesion lysis was done, foreign body was extracted, the ischemic bowel was resected, and an end-to-end anastomosis was performed using Lambert’s technique. The patient had a smooth recovery. Implementing the effective use of the WHO surgical checklists before incision and before closing the abdomen will prevent foreign body retention, hence reducing post-operative complications.

Keywords: Adhesions, Bowel obstruction, Retained foreign body.

References:

[1] Luijendijk, R. W., de Lange, D. C., Wauters, C. C., Hop, W. C., Duron, J. J., Pailler, J. L., Camprodon, B. R., Holmdahl, L., van Geldorp, H. J., & Jeekel, J. (1996). Foreign material in postoperative adhesions. Annals of surgery, 223(3), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199603000-00003.

[2] “WHO surgical safety checklist and implementation manual”. World Health Organization. 2010-12-08. Archived from the original on July 2, 2008. Retrieved 2015-04-23.

[3] Mock, Charles N.; Donkor, Peter; Gawande, Atul; Jamieson, Dean T.; Kruk, Margaret E.; Debas, Haile T. (2015). “1. Essential surgery: key messages of this volume”. In Debas, Haile T.; Peter, Donkor; Gawande, Atul; Jamison, Dean T.; Kruk, Margaret E. (eds.). Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 1): Essential Surgery. Vol. 1 (3rd ed.). Washington : World Bank Publications. p. 13. ISBN 978-1-4648-0346-8.

[4] “Decade of improved outcomes for patients thanks to Surgical Safety Checklist”. www.england.nhs.uk. Retrieved 5 February 2021.

[5] “WHO | WHO Surgical Safety Checklist”. WHO. Archived from the original on July 10, 2017. Retrieved 5 February 2021.

[6] Treadwell, Jonathan R; Lucas, Scott; Tsou, Amy Y (April 2014). “Surgical checklists: a systematic review of impacts and implementation”. BMJ Quality & Safety. 23 (4): 299–318. Doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001797. ISSN 2044-5415. PMC 3963558. PMID 23922403.

[7] WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery 2009. World Health Organization Press. 2009. p. 6. ISBN 978-92-4-159855-2. Archived from the original on November 7, 2017.

[8] Haynes, Alex B.; Weiser, Thomas G.; Berry, William R.; Lipsitz, Stuart R.; Breizat, Abdel-Hadi S.; Dellinger, E. Patchen; Herbosa, Teodoro; Joseph, Sudhir; Kibatala, Pascience L.; Lapitan, Marie Carmela M.; Merry, Alan F. (2009-01-29). “A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population”. New England Journal of Medicine. 360 (5): 491–499. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa0810119. ISSN 0028-4793. PMID 19144931.

[9] GlobalSurg Collaborative (2016). “Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle- and low-income countries”. British Journal of Surgery. 103 (8): 971–988. doi:10.1002/bjs.10151. hdl:20.500.11820/7c4589f5-7845-4405-a384-dfb5653e2163. PMID 27145169. S2CID 20764511.

[10] GlobalSurg Collaborative (2019). “Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy” (PDF). British Journal of Surgery. 106 (2) : 103–112. Doi:10.1002/bjs.11051. PMC 6492154. PMID 30620059.

[11] GlobalSurg Collaborative (2019). “Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy” (PDF). British Journal of Surgery. 106 (2) : 103–112. Doi:10.1002/bjs.11051. PMC 6492154. PMID 30620059.

[12] Ellis, H., Moran, B. J., Thompson, J. N., Parker, M. C., Wilson, M. S., Menzies, D., McGuire, A., Lower, A. M., Hawthorn, R. J., O’Brien, F., Buchan, S., & Crowe, A. M. (1999). Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet (London, England), 353(9163), 1476–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09337-4.

[13] Wilson, I., & Walker, I. (2009). The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist: the evidence. Journal of perioperative practice, 19(10), 362–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/175045890901901002.

[14] Gawande, A. A., Studdert, D. M., Orav, E. J., Brennan, T. A., & Zinner, M. J. (2003). Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. The New England journal of medicine, 348(3), 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa021721.

[15] Rowlands A. (2012). Risk factors associated with incorrect surgical counts. AORN journal, 96(3), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2012.06.012.

[16] González-Quintero, V. H., & Cruz-Pachano, F. E. (2009). Preventing adhesions in obstetric and gynecologic surgical procedures. Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology, 2(1), 38–45.

[17] Ergul, E., & Korukluoglu, B. (2008). Peritoneal adhesions: facing the enemy. International journal of surgery (London, England), 6(3), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.05.010.

[18] Ten Broek, R. P., Strik, C., Issa, Y., Bleichrodt, R. P., & van Goor, H. (2013). Adhesiolysis-related morbidity in abdominal surgery. Annals of surgery, 258(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826f4969.

[19] Wan, W., Le, T., Riskin, L., & Macario, A. (2009). Improving safety in the operating room: a systematic literature review of retained surgical sponges. Current opinion in anaesthesiology, 22(2), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e328324f82d.

[20] Ulsenheimer K. (2007). Belassene Fremdkörper--aus der Sicht des Juristen [Retained foreign bodies from the point of view of the jurist]. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 78(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-006-1280-6.

[21] Fouelifack, F. Y., Fouogue, J. T., Fouedjio, J. H., & Sando, Z. (2013). A case of abdominal textiloma following gynecologic surgery at the Yaounde Central Hospital, Cameroon. The Pan African medical journal, 16, 147. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2013.16.147.3201.

[22] Mefire, A. C., Tchounzou, R., Guifo, M. L., Fokou, M., Pagbe, J. J., Essomba, A., & Malonga, E. E. (2009). Retained sponge after abdominal surgery: experience from a third world country. The Pan African Medical Journal, 2, 10.

[23] Greenberg, C. C., Regenbogen, S. E., Lipsitz, S. R., Diaz-Flores, R., & Gawande, A. A. (2008). The frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count. Annals of surgery, 248(2), 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318181c9a3.

[24] Serghini, I., El Fikri, A., Salim Lalaoui, J., Zoubir, M., Boui, M., & Boughanem, M. (2011). Textilome abdominal : à propos d’un cas. The Pan African Medical Journal, 9.

[25] Târcoveanu, E., Dimofte, G., Georgescu, S., Vasilescu, A., Lupaşcu, C., Bradea, C., & Van Hee, R. (2011). Laparoscopic retrieval of gossypibomas--short series and review of literature. Acta chirurgica Belgica, 111(6), 366–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2011.11680774.

[26] Smith DA, Kashyap S, Nehring SM. Bowel Obstruction. [Updated 2022 Jun 5]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441975/.

[27] Kopka, L., Fischer, U., Gross, A. J., Funke, M., Oestmann, J. W., & Grabbe, E. (1996). CT of retained surgical sponges (textilomas): pitfalls in detection and evaluation. Journal of computer assisted tomography, 20(6), 919–923. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199611000-00009.

[28] Lauwers, P. R., & Van Hee, R. H. (2000). Intraperitoneal gossypibomas: the need to count sponges. World journal of surgery, 24(5), 521–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002689910084.

[29] van Steensel, S., van den Hil, L., Schreinemacher, M., Ten Broek, R., van Goor, H., & Bouvy, N. D. (2018). Adhesion awareness in 2016: An update of the national survey of surgeons. PloS one, 13(8), e0202418. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202418.

[30] Ten Broek, R. P., Strik, C., Issa, Y., Bleichrodt, R. P., & van Goor, H. (2013). Adhesiolysis-related morbidity in abdominal surgery. Annals of surgery, 258(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826f4969.