Evaluation of the Maternal Death Surveillance and Response System, Sanyati, Zimbabwe 2017

Download Article

DOI: 10.21522/TIJPH.2013.05.02.Art007

Authors : Daniel Chirundu


Background: Combating maternal mortality requires a functional Maternal Death Surveillance and Response system (MDSR). In Zimbabwe, maternal mortality ratio was 651 deaths per 100 000 live births in 2015. Only five out of 25 deaths were notified on time in Sanyati District 2015-2016. We evaluated the system to determine if it was serving its intended purpose.

Methods: We conducted a descriptive cross sectional study using the MDSR technical guidance and the updated CDC guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems. Data were collected using interviewer administered questionnaires, key informant interviews, focused group discussions and records review. Medians, proportions and frequencies were calculated using Epi Info 7. Qualitative data was analysed using word cloud.

Results: We interviewed 216 health workers out of 230 involved in MDSR. Ninety-nine percent were nurses. Sixty-two percent correctly defined a maternal death. Ninety-eight percent found the system useful. Those confident to notify a maternal death were 139(68%). Easy access to case information was reported by 91(62%). Data was analysed by 138(80%) and used to monitor maternal mortality trends. Information sharing with stakeholders was reported by 59(31%). Ninety-seven percent were willing to continue participating. The cost of notifying a single death was USD$ 246.09. All community deaths were not being captured by the system as reported by 128(59%). Key informants and focused group discussions outcomes highlighted concerns of unreported community deaths. There was no zero reporting of community maternal deaths.

Conclusion: The MDSR system was useful, acceptable, simple and not costly. The system was also unstable, unrepresentative and not timely. Minimal stakeholder and community involvement, inadequate human resources and training, hampered the systems performance. We recommend health worker training and conducting an interventional study to assess the effectiveness of community involvement in reporting maternal deaths.

Keywords: Maternal Death, Surveillance, Response, Sanyati, Zimbabwe.


[1]. Agaro C, Kashesya, J. B, Waiswa P, Sekandi J. N, Tusiime S, Anguzu R: The conduct of maternal and perinatal death reviews in Oyam District, Uganda: a descriptive cross-sectional study BMC Women’s Health (2016) 16:38.

[2]. Barnett S, Nair N, Tripathy P, et al: A prospective key informant surveillance system to measure maternal mortality - findings from indigenous populations in Jharkhand and Orissa, India. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2008, 8:6.

[3]. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Updated Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems, Recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group, MMWR Recommendations and Reports, July 27, 2001;50(RR-13):1–35,

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5013a1.htm, Accessed 28 September 1300 Hours, 2016.

[4]. Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G, Dawson A, Drife J, Garrod D, et al. Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer:2006–2008. The eighth report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG 2011; 118(Suppl. 1):1–203.

[5]. Danel I, Graham WJ, Boerma T: Maternal death surveillance and response. Bull World Health Organ 2011, 89(11):779. 779A.

[6]. Gilmore K, Gebreyesus TA: What will it take to eliminate preventable maternal deaths? Lancet 2012, 380(9837):87–88.

[7]. Hounton S, Bernis L, Hussein J, Graham W. J, Danel I, Byass P: Towards elimination of maternal deaths: maternal deaths surveillance and response. Reproductive Health 2013 10:1.

[8]. IDSR – Technical Guidelines for Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response in the African Region, 2nd Edition – 2010

[9]. Ina May Gaskin: Maternal Death in the United States A Problem Solved or a Problem Ignored? The Journal of Perinatal Education Spring 2008, Volume 17, Number 2.

[10]. Negandhi PH, Neogi SB, Chopra S, Phogat A, Sahota R, Gupta R:Improving reporting of infant deaths, maternal deaths and stillbirths in Haryana, India. Bulletin of the World Health Organization

[11]. Prata N, Passano P, Sreenivas A and Gerdts C.E: Maternal mortality in developing countries: Challenges in scaling up priority interventions, Women’s Health (2010).

[12]. Sombie I, Meda N, Hounton S, Bambara M, Ouedraogo TW, Graham W: Missing maternal deaths: lessons from SouroSanou University Hospital in Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. Trop Doct 2007, 37(2):96–98.

[13]. The Zimbabwe Demographic and Health Survey 2015 key indicators

[14]. United Nations Zimbabwe 2012 Millennium development goals progress report.

[15]. World Health Organisation, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank, United Nations Populations Division. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2013. Geneva: WHO:2014

http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/monitoring/maternalmortality-2013/en/Accessed 28 September 2016.

[16]. World Health Organization. Maternal Death Surveillance and Response: Technical guidance. Information for action to prevent maternal death. Geneva: WHO; 2013. http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/maternal_death_surveillance/en/ Accessed 28 September 2016.

[17]. World Health Organisation (2012). The WHO application of ICD-10 to deaths during pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium: ICD-MM. Geneva: WHO. Available at:


[18]. WHO (2011). Commission on information and accountability for women’s and children’s health. keeping promises, measuring results. http://www.who.int/topics/millennium_development_goals/

 accountability_commission/Commission_Report_advance_copy.pdf. Accessed 11 September 2016.

[19]. World Bank (2011). Maternal Death Audit as a Tool Reducing Maternal Mortality. Washington, DC: World Bank.

http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPRH/Resources/376374-1278599377733/ Maternal Death Audit Accessed 28 September 2016